2009
DOI: 10.1159/000253861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making Performance among Pathological Gamblers

Abstract: Background: Pathological gambling is classified as an impulse control disorder in the DSM-IV-TR; however, few studies have investigated the relationship between gambling behavior and impulsive decision-making in time-non-limited situations. Methods: The subjects performed the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). The MFFT investigated the reflection-impulsivity dimension in pathological gamblers (n = 82) and demographically matched healthy subjects (n = 82).Results:Our study demonstrated that pathological gam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggested that these impairments could reflect pre-existing vulnerability factors in the addictions. On 'Reflection impulsivity' task, pathological gamblers have a higher rate of errors than healthy controls, but are not different in terms of response time [38] . Little is known about 'Reflection impulsivity' in adult ADHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The authors suggested that these impairments could reflect pre-existing vulnerability factors in the addictions. On 'Reflection impulsivity' task, pathological gamblers have a higher rate of errors than healthy controls, but are not different in terms of response time [38] . Little is known about 'Reflection impulsivity' in adult ADHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Impulse control disorders share biopsychological vulnerabilities and clinical and psychopathological characteristics, expressed in the form of neuropsychological deficits [2,3], personality traits, namely impulsivity or risk-taking [4], and psychopathological impairment [5]. In individuals with PG, higher impulsivity has been associated with specific subgroups of patients, severity of the disorder, poorer psychological functioning, less effective coping skills and poorer treatment outcome [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of clinical evidence suggest common features of PG and substance dependence [3]; however, the disorder is currently categorized in the group of ‘Habit and impulse disorders’ in ICD-10 [4] and ‘Impulsive control disorders not elsewhere classified’ in DSM-IV [5] but will be moved to the category ‘Substance use and addictive disorders’ in DSM-V [6]. Shared characteristics of PG and substance dependence include genetic [7], clinical [8,9] and common neural features, especially alterations of the dopaminergic mesolimbic reward system [10]. This system, containing dopaminergic neurons that project from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) [11], has repeatedly been shown to be dysfunctional in patients with substance-related addictions like alcohol dependence [12,13,14] and cocaine dependence [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%