2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed- and accuracy-related measures of an intelligence test are differentially predicted by the speed and accuracy measures of a cognitive task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed to be able to predict students' success in recognizing symbols, reading, information processing, and more importantly, their intelligence. Research shows that intelligence is predicted by speed and accuracy (Borter, Troche, & Rammsayer, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed to be able to predict students' success in recognizing symbols, reading, information processing, and more importantly, their intelligence. Research shows that intelligence is predicted by speed and accuracy (Borter, Troche, & Rammsayer, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were 67 men and 133 women ranging in age from 17 to 30 years (M = 22.6, SD = 2.5 years), who were also subjects in the study by Borter et al (2018) on another research question. A total of 149 participants were university students and 51 participants did not have secondary education.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, other constructs or sources of method effects additionally need to be represented as part of the model of measurement in order to account for the observed variation. For example, in reasoning scales, speed effects, difficulty effects, and item-position effects have been found to account for the response variation besides reasoning (e.g., Borter, Troche, & Rammsayer, 2018; Lozano, 2015; Zeller, Reiss, & Schweizer, 2017). Regarding questionnaires, the sources of the item wording and item position effects have been found to exert an additional influence on responding so that the one-factor model considering the trait only is likely to fail in an investigation into such data (e.g., Distefano & Motl, 2006; Knowles, 1988).…”
Section: Scaling Of the Variances Of Latent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%