Speed Effect to a Quarter Car ARX Model Based on System Identification

Abstract

This paper presents the effect of car speeds on a quarter car passive suspension system model dynamics. The model is identified using system identification technique, in which the input-output data are collected by running a test car on an artificial road surface with two different speeds i.e., 10 km/h and 20 km/h. The quarter car passive suspension system dynamics is assumed to have an ARX model structure and identified using linear least-square estimation algorithm. The car vertical body acceleration, which is the output variable, is measured by installing an accelerometer sensor on the car body, above the suspension. On the other hand, the car shaft acceleration, which is the input variable, is measured by installing an accelerometer sensor at the lower arm of the car suspension. The best model for the 10 km/h car speed gives the output order () = 4, the input order () = 2, delay (d) = 1, the best fit = 90.65%, and the Akaike's Final Prediction Error (FPE) = 5.315e-06. In contrast, the 20 km/h speed results in 4 th output order (), 1 st the input order (), 1 st delay (d), the best fit of 91.05%, and 7.503e-05 Akaike's FPE. These results show that the higher speed reduces the effect of the road surface to car dynamics, which is indicated by the order of the model Keywords-a quarter car passive suspension system dynamics; speed; running test; artificial road surface; ARX model

Hammerstein Model Based RLS Algorithm for Modeling the Intelligent Pneumatic Actuator (IPA) System

“…Besides, the developed Hammerstein model is also considered acceptable if it manage to provide the model with higher best fit, lower loss function and lower final prediction error. The equation used to determine the percentage of best fit, loss function and final prediction error can be represented as in Equation (13), Equation (14) and Equation (15), respectively. (13) where is the measured output, the estimated output and the mean value of the measured output.…”

“…The equation used to determine the percentage of best fit, loss function and final prediction error can be represented as in Equation (13), Equation (14) and Equation (15), respectively. (13) where is the measured output, the estimated output and the mean value of the measured output. (14) where, where is the number of data points and the estimation error.…”

“…This study will focus on the second approach for modeling the pneumatic system utilized. A highly practical alternative and easily deal with the complex system or process [12], [13] are the reasons why the latter approach is selected to be employed.…”

ARX, ARMAX, Box-Jenkins, Output-Error, and Hammerstein Models for Modeling Intelligent Pneumatic Actuator (IPA) System

“…The second approach to modelling the pneumatic system would concentrate on this analysis. A highly functional solution and easy to work with the complicated system or process are why the second approach is preferred [11,12]. In addition, there are a few model constructs in system identification that can be used to describe the system [13].…”

NARX-based BPSO modelling for time-varying steam temperature of steam distillation pilot plant

“…A system identification involves linear and nonlinear modelling [1][2][3]. A distillation column has reported by a broad application of the nonlinear dynamic behaviour [4][5][6][7][8].…”