SAE Technical Paper Series 1995
DOI: 10.4271/950354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed from Skids: A Modern Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) is the braking initial velocity, unit: m / s; φ is the tire / road adhesion coefficient; i is the road gradient (%); S is the length of the braking trace, the unit: m. Use Neptune model [7] for solving vehicle the braking speed:…”
Section: The Analysis Methods According To Braking Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) is the braking initial velocity, unit: m / s; φ is the tire / road adhesion coefficient; i is the road gradient (%); S is the length of the braking trace, the unit: m. Use Neptune model [7] for solving vehicle the braking speed:…”
Section: The Analysis Methods According To Braking Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in figures 6 and 7, braking data derived from published road tests, are free from any transient braking phase. As a consequence, it must be observed that when determining the drag factor, the transient process must be excluded from the calculation of average deceleration; when calculating pre-impact speed, it must be taken into account [13].…”
Section: Measuring Vehicular Deceleration With Accelerometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in its original intended use to back-estimate vehicle speed from skidding, several limitations do exist and have been mentioned by past studies. For instance, Neptune, Flynn, Chavez, and Underwood (1995) noted on such a limitation that the formula does not account for the energy converted to work during the transient portion of the braking process. Consequently, a more accurate estimation that considered the pre-skidding braking was proposed, but the improved estimation was still generally based on the simplistic formula (Neptune et al, 1995).…”
Section: Skid Mark and Accident Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Neptune, Flynn, Chavez, and Underwood (1995) noted on such a limitation that the formula does not account for the energy converted to work during the transient portion of the braking process. Consequently, a more accurate estimation that considered the pre-skidding braking was proposed, but the improved estimation was still generally based on the simplistic formula (Neptune et al, 1995). Meanwhile, more recent researches have the focus on braking distance estimation instead due to the development of some active safety systems like the collision avoidance system.…”
Section: Skid Mark and Accident Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%