2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed of adoption of improved maize varieties in Tanzania: An application of duration analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
48
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
48
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the effects marginal watch that the fact to be aged driven a growth of the probability of adoption of the improved varieties of sesame of 0.006 point. This result is similar to the one found in Tanzania (Beyene & Kassie, 2015) to the doorstep of 1% for the maize, to Nigeria for the cowpea to the doorstep of 5% (Adéoti et al, 2002), in Ethiopia to the doorstep of 10% for the stones lines (Aklilu & Jan, 2007) in Centrafrique for rice to the doorstep of 1% (Bessane-Mbetid, 2014), to Cameroon for the maize to the doorstep of 5% (Etoundi and Kamgna, 2008), to Nepal to the doorstep of 10% for the adoption of the potato (Kafle & Shah, 2012). This result is also in conformity with the one found in Zambia (Kaliba et al, 2000) for the adoption of improved varieties of maize in the doorstep of 1%.…”
Section: Factors Of Adoption Of the Improved Varieties Of Sesamesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The analysis of the effects marginal watch that the fact to be aged driven a growth of the probability of adoption of the improved varieties of sesame of 0.006 point. This result is similar to the one found in Tanzania (Beyene & Kassie, 2015) to the doorstep of 1% for the maize, to Nigeria for the cowpea to the doorstep of 5% (Adéoti et al, 2002), in Ethiopia to the doorstep of 10% for the stones lines (Aklilu & Jan, 2007) in Centrafrique for rice to the doorstep of 1% (Bessane-Mbetid, 2014), to Cameroon for the maize to the doorstep of 5% (Etoundi and Kamgna, 2008), to Nepal to the doorstep of 10% for the adoption of the potato (Kafle & Shah, 2012). This result is also in conformity with the one found in Zambia (Kaliba et al, 2000) for the adoption of improved varieties of maize in the doorstep of 1%.…”
Section: Factors Of Adoption Of the Improved Varieties Of Sesamesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recently (Fuglie and Kascak, 2001;M. Burton et al, 2003;Dadi et al, 2004;Abdulai and Huffman, 2005;Matuschke and Qaim, 2008, Butler and Moser, 2010, and Beyene and Kassie, 2015Lemessa, 2017) it has been used to capture the dynamic aspects of new technology adoption processes. The particular cases where duration analysis has been applied is in adoption of agricultural technologies for improved maize, potato, common bean varieties, etc.…”
Section: Econometric Specification Of Duration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'Emden et al (2006) also investigated significant variables on the soil-conserving adoption by grain farmers in Australia. Matuschke and Qaim (2008) and Beyene and Kassie (2015) studied the dynamics of hybrid pearl and improved maize varieties adoption in India and Tanzania, respectively.…”
Section: Econometric Specification Of Duration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technological interventions ( [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]), in general, and irrigation projects ( [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]), in particular, often result in a low level of awareness among the target group and in a low level of successful diffusion of the project (i.e., dissemination of knowledge leading to participation) because farmers are rarely consulted a priori about their specific circumstances, priority problems, and expectations. a duration model in the U.S. to estimate the long-term trends in the adoption and diffusion of technologies designed to reduce environmental externalities from agriculture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%