2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45828-x_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speedup Prediction for Selective Compilation of Embedded Java Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also sort constant according to their type to increase redundancy and consequently improve compression ratio. 4 Overview of our profiler…”
Section: Techniques Included In the Profilermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can also sort constant according to their type to increase redundancy and consequently improve compression ratio. 4 Overview of our profiler…”
Section: Techniques Included In the Profilermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compiled code is faster but its size is greater than the same interpreted code. Colin [4] proposes a compilation framework for AOT compilers. His profiler records execution time and calls frequency of each method then selects code portions to be compiled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the virtual machine is the main drawback of this approach, which also requires that the virtual machine is ported to the target platform. Some of the performance issues are addressed with JIT [13] and customized embedded virtual machines [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the virtual machine is the main drawback of this approach, which also requires that the virtual machine is ported to the target platform. Some of the performance issues are addressed with JIT [Aycock 2003] and customized embedded virtual machines [Verdiere et al 2002].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%