Engineering Seismology, Geotechnical and Structural Earthquake Engineering 2013
DOI: 10.5772/55439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speedy Techniques to Evaluate Seismic Site Effects in Particular Geomorphologic Conditions: Faults, Cavities, Landslides and Topographic Irregularities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the spatial master plan of the city of Ivanec dated from 2012 [3] and amendments from 2016, the maximum allowed construction height of the buildings is 12-15 m (four or five floors) in the urban residential area in the central part of the city (Figure 1b In recent earthquakes (e.g., Mexico City 1985), it was observed that recorded ground motions on soft soil sites (e.g., alluvial basins, soft sediments) were significantly larger than those recorded on In recent earthquakes (e.g., Mexico City 1985), it was observed that recorded ground motions on soft soil sites (e.g., alluvial basins, soft sediments) were significantly larger than those recorded on nearby rock outcrops [4][5][6][7]. One of the challenges in earthquake engineering practice is to evaluate the local ground response in order to predict site amplification of surface ground motions based on specific geological site characteristics, geometrical features of soil deposits and surface topography [6,8,9]. In practice, the effects of local soil conditions were evaluated using the amplification factor: the ratio of ground motion at the free surface and ground motion at a nearby rock site [5,6,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the spatial master plan of the city of Ivanec dated from 2012 [3] and amendments from 2016, the maximum allowed construction height of the buildings is 12-15 m (four or five floors) in the urban residential area in the central part of the city (Figure 1b In recent earthquakes (e.g., Mexico City 1985), it was observed that recorded ground motions on soft soil sites (e.g., alluvial basins, soft sediments) were significantly larger than those recorded on In recent earthquakes (e.g., Mexico City 1985), it was observed that recorded ground motions on soft soil sites (e.g., alluvial basins, soft sediments) were significantly larger than those recorded on nearby rock outcrops [4][5][6][7]. One of the challenges in earthquake engineering practice is to evaluate the local ground response in order to predict site amplification of surface ground motions based on specific geological site characteristics, geometrical features of soil deposits and surface topography [6,8,9]. In practice, the effects of local soil conditions were evaluated using the amplification factor: the ratio of ground motion at the free surface and ground motion at a nearby rock site [5,6,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of clear peaks in the HVSR measurements performed adjacent to villages at higher elevations may be due, at least in part, to topographic amplification [44], also with complex effects related to vertical and lateral heterogeneities [45]. As already mentioned, the detailed assessment of such complex situations will require more thorough investigations through 2D and 3D analysis, to be carried out during subsequent levels of seismic microzonation, since the required parameters of the subsoil are presently not available.…”
Section: Model Of the Subsoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors affecting the seismic response of a site include topographical features, the geometry of sedimentary features, and the status of subsurface structures such as landslide deposits, structural discontinuities, cavities, and the presence of water (Panzera et al, 2013). The response of specifi c underground structures has been the focus of many previous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%