2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speleothem calcite farmed in situ: Modern calibration of δ18O and δ13C paleoclimate proxies in a continuously-monitored natural cave system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
342
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(366 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(203 reference statements)
22
342
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main problem is that many equations have been proposed for the calcite-water oxygen isotope fractionation (O'Neil et al, 1969;Friedman and O'Neil, 1977;Kim and O'Neil, 1997;Chacko and Deines, 2008;Coplen, 2007;Horita and Clayton, 2007;Dietzel et al, 2009;Demény et al, 2010;Zheng, 2011;Day and Henderson, 2011;Tremaine et al, 2011;Gabitov et al, 2012); these, however, provided different fractionation values for the same temperature. Two equations were selected as the Devils Hole location fulfils most of the theoretical requirements of equilibrium calcite precipitation (slow precipitation rate, stable environment, Coplen, 2007), while the equation established by Tremaine et al (2011) is based on a collection of natural cave deposit data selected by avoiding kinetic fractionation bias. The present day temperature of the cave site (9.7 ± 0.5 °C) and the dripwater composition (see section 2) yield calculated calcite compositions of -7.1 and -7.6‰ for the Coplen (2007) and Tremaine et al (2011) equations, respectively (with standard deviation of 0.2‰ as a result of temperature and water composition variations).…”
Section: Suitability Assessment Of the Bar-ii Stalagmitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main problem is that many equations have been proposed for the calcite-water oxygen isotope fractionation (O'Neil et al, 1969;Friedman and O'Neil, 1977;Kim and O'Neil, 1997;Chacko and Deines, 2008;Coplen, 2007;Horita and Clayton, 2007;Dietzel et al, 2009;Demény et al, 2010;Zheng, 2011;Day and Henderson, 2011;Tremaine et al, 2011;Gabitov et al, 2012); these, however, provided different fractionation values for the same temperature. Two equations were selected as the Devils Hole location fulfils most of the theoretical requirements of equilibrium calcite precipitation (slow precipitation rate, stable environment, Coplen, 2007), while the equation established by Tremaine et al (2011) is based on a collection of natural cave deposit data selected by avoiding kinetic fractionation bias. The present day temperature of the cave site (9.7 ± 0.5 °C) and the dripwater composition (see section 2) yield calculated calcite compositions of -7.1 and -7.6‰ for the Coplen (2007) and Tremaine et al (2011) equations, respectively (with standard deviation of 0.2‰ as a result of temperature and water composition variations).…”
Section: Suitability Assessment Of the Bar-ii Stalagmitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two equations were selected as the Devils Hole location fulfils most of the theoretical requirements of equilibrium calcite precipitation (slow precipitation rate, stable environment, Coplen, 2007), while the equation established by Tremaine et al (2011) is based on a collection of natural cave deposit data selected by avoiding kinetic fractionation bias. The present day temperature of the cave site (9.7 ± 0.5 °C) and the dripwater composition (see section 2) yield calculated calcite compositions of -7.1 and -7.6‰ for the Coplen (2007) and Tremaine et al (2011) equations, respectively (with standard deviation of 0.2‰ as a result of temperature and water composition variations). The BAR-II δ 18 O carb values range from -7.7 to -6.4‰ in the fully developed interglacial period (124 to 120 ka), which range partly overlaps the calculated compositions, suggesting that the BAR-II stalagmite was grown close to equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: Suitability Assessment Of the Bar-ii Stalagmitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next step is to separate the last two known influences: the host rock contribution and in-cave fractionation. Numerous cave-monitoring studies have demonstrated that fractionation in caves is kinetic rather than equilibrium in nature (Spötl et al, 2005;Frisia et al, 2011;Tremaine et al, 2011), thus precluding the use of equilibrium factors when estimating the fractionation effect. Therefore, we use the measured d 13 C of stalagmite LR06-B1 and initial d 13 C of soil-water DIC to further differentiate between host rock C contribution and fractionation effects inside the cave.…”
Section: Host Rock Contribution To Dcfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented instrument and application study are relevant for monitoring underground cavities, whether to understand CO 2 dynamics in visited and/or painted caves for preservation purposes [35] or to understand paleoclimate recording in speleothems [36]. However, in these applications with high CO 2 concentrations or CO 2 concentrations varying in a large range, using IRIS, remains very challenging at the moment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%