2020
DOI: 10.1177/1741143220905062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spending the pupil premium: What influences leaders’ decision-making?

Abstract: Introduced in England in 2011, the pupil premium policy was an ambitious reform aimed at tackling the persistent attainment gap between disadvantaged pupils and their more affluent peers. The policy provides school leaders with the professional autonomy to determine how pupil premium funding should be used. This article examines the decision-making processes and influences involved in the use of these additional resources. We conducted interviews with 21 school leaders from different contexts across the Midlan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some commentators are saying that the Pupil Premium funding is not always used properly by schools, or is otherwise not being effective. They are calling for the money to be used for school general funds (Allen 2018;Morris and Dobson 2020), or used to recruit, develop and retain teachers (Staufenberg 2019). With this kind of uncertainty about the impact and future of the policy, it is important to have good evidence of its effectiveness, and whether it is in need of modification or cancellation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commentators are saying that the Pupil Premium funding is not always used properly by schools, or is otherwise not being effective. They are calling for the money to be used for school general funds (Allen 2018;Morris and Dobson 2020), or used to recruit, develop and retain teachers (Staufenberg 2019). With this kind of uncertainty about the impact and future of the policy, it is important to have good evidence of its effectiveness, and whether it is in need of modification or cancellation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 39% to 60% in the case study schools were eligible for additional pupil premium (PP) funding to support disadvantaged pupils (Demie, 2019a). As noted by previous research (see DfE, 2015;EEF, 2019;Morris & Dobson, 2020), school leaders were influenced by a number of strategies to spend pupil premium funding to tackle disadvantages in their schools.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similar government policies around the world suggest that simply adding more money into the system, however specifically targeted, does not guarantee improvements for those children who have fallen furthest behind [20,21]. Despite this evidence, English school leaders are given autonomy over the pupil premium spend but must ensure that the funding drives improvements [22], and the need for school leaders to identify cost-effective interventions is therefore crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%