2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10512-021-00769-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Nuclear Materials Recycling in Two-Component Nuclear Energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Russia is implementing a strategy of two-component nuclear power generation, with slow and fast neutron reactors operating in a closed nuclear fuel cycle [ 1 ]. This will reduce the need for uranium through the recycling of actinides, and will allow the extraction of useful stable and radioactive isotopes necessary for industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Russia is implementing a strategy of two-component nuclear power generation, with slow and fast neutron reactors operating in a closed nuclear fuel cycle [ 1 ]. This will reduce the need for uranium through the recycling of actinides, and will allow the extraction of useful stable and radioactive isotopes necessary for industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the advanced nuclear fuel cycle, MAs are extracted for transmutation in fast reactors in homogeneous (Np) and heterogeneous (Am) modes [ 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. There is a proposal to store Curium for 70 to 200 years, to decay into Pu and fabricate nuclear fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strategy of two-component nuclear power with slow and fast neutron reactors is implemented in Russia in a closed cycle mode, i.e., with reprocessing of irradiated nuclear fuel (SNF) [1,2]. As a result, radioactive waste (RW), including high-level radioactive waste (HLW), is generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curium is proposed to be stored for 70 to 100 years to decay into plutonium and then utilize in the nuclear fuel production. It has been calculated [1,2,4] that in this case, after 300-500 years, the activity of the radionuclides remaining in the waste will be equal to the value of uranium ore (the principle of radiation equivalence); even faster, in 100 years, there will come a radiological (onco) equivalence, taking into account their potential harm to public health [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%