2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Katilius et al developed an affinity-based sperm purification method using magnetic streptavidin-coated beads with bound ligands modified using biotin. The epithelial and sperm cell mixtures were incubated with these beads to bind the sperm cells, with the epithelial DNA being removed . Microfluidics has also been used for differential extraction.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Sample Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Katilius et al developed an affinity-based sperm purification method using magnetic streptavidin-coated beads with bound ligands modified using biotin. The epithelial and sperm cell mixtures were incubated with these beads to bind the sperm cells, with the epithelial DNA being removed . Microfluidics has also been used for differential extraction.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Sample Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since antibody‐based affinity purification has a relatively low recovery of sperm (Li et al, 2014; Y. Xu et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2016), Slow Off‐rate Modified Aptamers (SOMAmers) were investigated as alternative affinity ligands to bind sperm (Katilius et al, 2018). In samples with abundant sperm, these synthetic aptamers with higher affinities than antibodies (Lollo, Steele, & Gold, 2014) proved to be as effective as standard DE in separating sperm from epithelial cells (Katilius et al, 2018). In samples with low sperm concentrations (less than 1:20 diluted semen), this method was less effective, likely due to general binding of the aptamers to the sperm tail.…”
Section: Isolation Of Male Dna In Sexual Assault Cases—alternatives Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In samples with low sperm concentrations (less than 1:20 diluted semen), this method was less effective, likely due to general binding of the aptamers to the sperm tail. In contrast, male DNA could be successfully recovered from even 1:640 semen dilutions by DE as the method was independent of the presence/absence of the sperm tail (Katilius et al, 2018). This suggests that the binding location of the ligand is more important than its binding strength in obtaining a higher yield of sperm.…”
Section: Isolation Of Male Dna In Sexual Assault Cases—alternatives Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of applications are performed with single base modified SOMAmers, as is the case for the SOMAscan platform or sandwich assays, the possible modifications and applications of SOMAmers reach far beyond this scope. For example, sandwich assays are described with double base-modified SOMAmers [ 95 ] and SOMAmers can be used for on-chip electrophoretic assays [ 125 ], the development of gravimetric aptasensors [ 126 ] or even for affinity pull-down experiments [ 127 ], highlighting the market potential of aptamers containing modified nucleobases.…”
Section: Strategies For Improving Binding Affinity Through Chemicamentioning
confidence: 99%