2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1177-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm competition risk affects male mate choice copying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We asked if individual focal males would spend more time associating with the previously rejected female of a pair of stimulus females after focal males had been able to observe another (model) male consort the rejected female. Previous studies confirmed that information obtained during MCC can indeed weaken or override intrinsic preferences for certain phenotypes during female [26,[36][37][38] and male mate choice [14,[31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Male Mate Choice Copyingmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We asked if individual focal males would spend more time associating with the previously rejected female of a pair of stimulus females after focal males had been able to observe another (model) male consort the rejected female. Previous studies confirmed that information obtained during MCC can indeed weaken or override intrinsic preferences for certain phenotypes during female [26,[36][37][38] and male mate choice [14,[31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Male Mate Choice Copyingmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…More recent studies, however, have started to acknowledge that also males copy the mate choice of other males [9]. Examples of male MCC come from an array of species, including a sex-role reversed pipefish, sticklebacks, darters and especially live bearing fishes [14,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Male Mate Choice Copyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many mating preferences are innate [1]; still, various extrinsic factors (ecological constraints) may affect individual mating decisions [8-10], such as altered possibilities for mate quality assessment due to increased costs of mate searching [11,12]. Additionally, the social environment of the choosing individual is known to affect the strength [13-17] or even the direction of mating preferences [18-20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that this male behavior still offers advantages even if the preferred female flees: on the one hand, a pattern of last male sperm precedence was uncovered in guppies 22, 80 , which renders mate choice copying a profitable option for the eavesdropping (copying) male 10 . However, the longer the time between copulations by the first and second male in the mating trials conducted by Evans and Magurran 80 , the higher the proportion of offspring fathered by the first male was.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%