Cryopreservation of Fish Gametes 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4025-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm Cryopreservation in Crustaceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 124 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EG was found to be the most toxic to the sperm of M. lateralis in this study as a lower D-stage larval rate was produced in comparison with other CPAs at each concentration assessed. This result was in agreement with the findings in most marine molluscan, fish and crustacean sperm cryopreservation (Liu et al, 2015;Magnotti et al, 2018;Morales-Ueno and Paniagua-Chavez, 2020). However, it should note that this chemical has often been selected as a suitable CPA for oocyte and larvae cryopreservation in some aquatic and domestic animals (Tervit et al, 2005;Cirino et al, 2019;Tharasanit and Thuwanut, 2021;Zhu et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…EG was found to be the most toxic to the sperm of M. lateralis in this study as a lower D-stage larval rate was produced in comparison with other CPAs at each concentration assessed. This result was in agreement with the findings in most marine molluscan, fish and crustacean sperm cryopreservation (Liu et al, 2015;Magnotti et al, 2018;Morales-Ueno and Paniagua-Chavez, 2020). However, it should note that this chemical has often been selected as a suitable CPA for oocyte and larvae cryopreservation in some aquatic and domestic animals (Tervit et al, 2005;Cirino et al, 2019;Tharasanit and Thuwanut, 2021;Zhu et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%