2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm kinematics and subpopulational responses during the cryopreservation process in caprine ejaculates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[95] On the other hand, it is widely known that different sperm subpopulations with distinct kinematic, functional and morphometric characteristics coexist in the ejaculates [105][106][107], which leads to interand intra-male variations. The different steps of freezing-thawing process have been shown to alter the distribution of these kinematic and morphometric sperm subpopulations originally present in fresh ejaculates of ram, bull and buck [108][109][110]. These findings suggest that those fresh ejaculates with a higher subpopulation of sperm exhibiting a fast and progressive motility pattern as well as a low sperm head area could resist more the cryopreservation process.…”
Section: Protein Namementioning
confidence: 94%
“…[95] On the other hand, it is widely known that different sperm subpopulations with distinct kinematic, functional and morphometric characteristics coexist in the ejaculates [105][106][107], which leads to interand intra-male variations. The different steps of freezing-thawing process have been shown to alter the distribution of these kinematic and morphometric sperm subpopulations originally present in fresh ejaculates of ram, bull and buck [108][109][110]. These findings suggest that those fresh ejaculates with a higher subpopulation of sperm exhibiting a fast and progressive motility pattern as well as a low sperm head area could resist more the cryopreservation process.…”
Section: Protein Namementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) allows assessing the sperm kinetics and the individual record of their trajectories (Amann & Waberski, 2014;Barbas et al, 2018;Holt & Satake, 2018), based on multivariate statistical analyses to identify and monitor the behaviour of sperm subpopulations within an ejaculate (Souza et al, 2018). The determination of sperm subpopulations based on individual sperm kinetics has been reported in animal species such as domestic cats (Gutiérrez-Reinoso & García-Herreros, 2016;Souza et al, 2018), dogs (Núñez-Martínez et al, 2006;Peña et al, 2012), stallions (Quintero-Moreno et al, 2003), donkeys (Flores et al, 2008), sheep (Barbas et al, 2018;Bergstein-Galan et al, 2017;Dorado et al, 2011;Santolaria et al, 2015), boars (Estrada et al, 2017;Flores et al, 2009), rabbits (Quintero-Moreno et al, 2007) and red deer (Martinez-Pastor et al, 2005). In bulls, studies that evaluated fresh semen and post-thawed samples identified four sperm subpopulations (Ferraz et al, 2014;Ibanescu et al, 2020;Muiño et al, 2009;Muiño, Rivera, et al, 2008;Muiño, Tamargo, et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the study of the sperm subpopulations in an ejaculate, provides relevant information regarding the functional diversity of the sperm groups (Yániz et al, 2018), ensuring a more accurate analysis. Because, the average values can mask the effects of various treatments on spermatozoa and not consider the intrinsic variability in the ejaculate (Barbas et al, 2018;Holt & Satake, 2018), causing loss of important information (Martinez-Pastor et al, 2011). In addition, the characterization of the sperm subpopulations allows to evidence differences between the experimental groups, between different treatments, in which many of the effects are still unknown (Amann & Waberski, 2014;Kathiravan et al, 2011) and also be used to predict herd reproductive performance (Kathiravan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motility pattern of each subpopulation and the proportion of spermatozoa distributed within them can also be affected by the cryopreservation process. In several species, freezing—thawing procedures altered those motile sperm subpopulations present in fresh ejaculates [ 4 , 22 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%