2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm phenotypic characteristics and oviduct binding ability are altered in breeding bulls with high sperm DNA fragmentation index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reasons are attributed to the decreased fertility of cryopreserved semen, primarily damage that occurs in spermatozoa during cryopreservation (cryodamage), which alters its fertilising potential ( Cormier et al, 1997 ; Watson, 2000 ; Yeste, 2016 ). The process of cryopreservation results in the death of almost 50% of spermatozoa, while the remaining sperm population shows altered functional competencies ( Kumaresan et al, 2011 ; Kumaresan et al, 2012 ; Singh et al, 2016 ; Kumaresan et al, 2017 ; Saraf et al, 2019 ; Rather et al, 2020 ; Vignesh et al, 2020 ; Nag et al, 2021 ), which might be linked to the reduced fertility of cryopreserved semen. However, the fertility of cryopreserved semen subjected to sperm selection methods (for the selection of viable, active, and phenotypically normal spermatozoa) was also not as good as that of fresh semen, although some improvement in fertility was observed ( Said and Land, 2011 ; Marzano et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reasons are attributed to the decreased fertility of cryopreserved semen, primarily damage that occurs in spermatozoa during cryopreservation (cryodamage), which alters its fertilising potential ( Cormier et al, 1997 ; Watson, 2000 ; Yeste, 2016 ). The process of cryopreservation results in the death of almost 50% of spermatozoa, while the remaining sperm population shows altered functional competencies ( Kumaresan et al, 2011 ; Kumaresan et al, 2012 ; Singh et al, 2016 ; Kumaresan et al, 2017 ; Saraf et al, 2019 ; Rather et al, 2020 ; Vignesh et al, 2020 ; Nag et al, 2021 ), which might be linked to the reduced fertility of cryopreserved semen. However, the fertility of cryopreserved semen subjected to sperm selection methods (for the selection of viable, active, and phenotypically normal spermatozoa) was also not as good as that of fresh semen, although some improvement in fertility was observed ( Said and Land, 2011 ; Marzano et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of in vitro studies supports this narrative (see Table 2). Overall, they show that OECs preferentially bind uncapacitated sperm [64,93,100,101] with higher DNA integrity [102,103]. Some of the differences observed between bound and free-swimming sperm were detected only after 3 minute of incubation [93].…”
Section: Boar Ex Vivo Oviduct Explantmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Karoui and co-authors found a negative association between bull fertility and sperm DNA fragmentation using the halo test ( 78 ). DNA integrity is essential for bovine embryonic development ( 79 ), and DFI is negatively correlated with sperm binding index and conception rates ( 80 ). Interestingly, the sperm viability and motility become affected earlier than DNA, and occurrence of single-stranded DNA breaks happens in parallel with chromatin decondensation and deprotamination ( 81 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%