2023
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spermatozoa isolation with Felix™ outperforms conventional density gradient centrifugation preparation in selecting cells with low DNA damage

Abstract: BackgroundThe optimization of spermatozoa preparation techniques in order to obtain cell fractions enriched with structurally and functionally “superior” spermatozoa is a key objective of the assisted reproduction industry.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate a recent development of an electrophoretic spermatozoa separation device (Felix™, Memphasys Ltd, Sydney, Australia) and to compare its performance with conventional spermatozoa preparation by density gradient centrifugation (DGC). Particula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, beyond masking the allogeneic properties of the sperm cell, the accompanying increase in electronegativity brought about by sialyation has formed the basis of electrophoretic separation techniques designed to rapidly fractionate mature spermatozoa away from other deleterious ejaculate contaminates (i.e., immature germ cells, bacteria, and leucocytes) (90) (Figure 1). One such recent development, now marketed under the trademark of the Felix Sperm Separation System, has shown promise for the isolation of suspensions of viable, morphologically normal spermatozoa with high levels of total and progressive motility, and low levels of DNA damage (37,(90)(91)(92)(93). Clinical compatibility has also been demonstrated with biopsied material, snap-frozen sperm suspensions and cryostored semen, and the first report of a human pregnancy and live birth using electrophoretically isolated spermatozoa (91).…”
Section: Sperm Surface Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, beyond masking the allogeneic properties of the sperm cell, the accompanying increase in electronegativity brought about by sialyation has formed the basis of electrophoretic separation techniques designed to rapidly fractionate mature spermatozoa away from other deleterious ejaculate contaminates (i.e., immature germ cells, bacteria, and leucocytes) (90) (Figure 1). One such recent development, now marketed under the trademark of the Felix Sperm Separation System, has shown promise for the isolation of suspensions of viable, morphologically normal spermatozoa with high levels of total and progressive motility, and low levels of DNA damage (37,(90)(91)(92)(93). Clinical compatibility has also been demonstrated with biopsied material, snap-frozen sperm suspensions and cryostored semen, and the first report of a human pregnancy and live birth using electrophoretically isolated spermatozoa (91).…”
Section: Sperm Surface Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we cannot yet treat the oxidative stress at source perhaps, in the interim, we can develop methods for the physical selection of spermatozoa exhibiting minimal levels of oxidative stress and DNA damage for use in assisted conception procedures. In this Special Issue, Villeneuve et al 16 . describe a novel electrophoretic sperm isolation procedure that achieves this end.…”
Section: Selecting Sperm Exhibiting Low Levels Of Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we cannot yet treat the oxidative stress at source perhaps, in the interim, we can develop methods for the physical selection of spermatozoa exhibiting minimal levels of oxidative stress and DNA damage for use in assisted conception procedures. In this Special Issue, Villeneuve et al 16 describe a novel electrophoretic sperm isolation procedure that achieves this end. In comparison with conventional DGC procedures, this device isolated spermatozoa with significantly improved motility, reduced DNA fragmentation, and dramatically lower levels of oxidative DNA damage; moreover, these outcomes were achieved in a fraction of the time (∼6 min) taken by DGC (typically ∼55 min).…”
Section: Selecting Sperm Exhibiting Low Levels Of Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%