2010
DOI: 10.1644/864.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spermophilus xanthoprymnus (Rodentia: Sciuridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, European ground squirrel colonies at higher altitudes are not common, unlike the Asia Minor ground squirrel (Spermophilus xanthoprymnus), which prefers elevations from 800 to 2900 m a.s.l. (Gür and Gür, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, European ground squirrel colonies at higher altitudes are not common, unlike the Asia Minor ground squirrel (Spermophilus xanthoprymnus), which prefers elevations from 800 to 2900 m a.s.l. (Gür and Gür, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, the remains from Dursunlu and Emirkaya were identified as Spermophilus sp. Gür and Gür (2010) assume stability of the core habitats of S. xanthoprymnus in Asia Minor and conclude, these records probably represent this species because they are within the extant range of the Anatolian ground squirrel. (Kryštufek et al, 2009), N -Northern lineage (N1-12), S-Southern lineage (S1-14), J (J1-5) -Jakupica lineage, which can be considered as a part of the Southern lineage (Říčanová et al, 2013); (c) putative pathways of the expansion of S. citellus, based on Říčanová et al (2013), but modified to accommodate fossil data.…”
Section: Extant and Fossil Rangesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The extant Spermophilus xanthoprymnus is distributed in Anatolia and along the Anatolian borders of Iran and Armenia (Gür and Gür, 2010). Unfortunately, the fossil record of this species is poor and its remains are uncommon until the Holocene (Gromov et al, 1965).…”
Section: Extant and Fossil Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to S. taurensis, diagnostic characters for S. citellus are as follows: less reddish dorsal pelage, underside more yellow, smaller body size (S. taurensis, range: 194-201 mm; S. citellus, range: 174-228 mm), tail slightly longer (S. taurensis, range: 62-65 mm; S. citellus, range: 31-90 mm) with a dark stripe along its dorsal side, and hind-foot length shorter (S. taurensis, range: 39-44 mm; S. citellus, range: 30-43 mm- Vohralík 2005, 2012;Gündüz et al 2007;Özkurt et al 2007). Compared to S. xanthoprymnus (see Gür and Gür 2010), diagnostic characters for S. citellus are as follows: the skull is less angular, back indistinctly spotted, and tail longer (S. xanthoprymnus, range: 30-72 mm; S. citellus, range: 31-90 mm) with black hairs dorsally Vohralík 2005, 2012). S. citellus, S. taurensis, and S. xanthoprymnus can be clearly distinguished on the basis of their alarm calls (Schneiderova´and Policht 2011a, 2011b.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%