1999
DOI: 10.1021/ic990573g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical and Aspherical Intermolecular Force Fields for Sulfur Allotropes

Abstract: Elemental sulfur exists in many crystalline forms, with many of these forms being composed of discrete S n cyclic molecules. Eleven experimentally determined S n crystal structures are used to define a new spherical S···S intermolecular force field of the (exp-6) type. Evidence is presented that the bonded sulfur atom in these structures is not spherical. The asphericity was modeled by placing repulsion bumps at optimized locations on the sulfur atoms to represent lone pair electron repulsion. The bump locat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, agreement with the experimental crystal structures is somewhat worse than for other compounds. Abraha and Williams,81 who considered a set of crystal structures of elemental sulfur (S n ), presented evidence that the bonded sulfur atom in these structures is not spherical and that an aspherical van der Waals model was necessary to achieve acceptable agreement with the experimental data. Implementation of such aspherical model may also increase accuracy of the potential for other sulfur‐containing molecules albeit at a higher computational cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, agreement with the experimental crystal structures is somewhat worse than for other compounds. Abraha and Williams,81 who considered a set of crystal structures of elemental sulfur (S n ), presented evidence that the bonded sulfur atom in these structures is not spherical and that an aspherical van der Waals model was necessary to achieve acceptable agreement with the experimental data. Implementation of such aspherical model may also increase accuracy of the potential for other sulfur‐containing molecules albeit at a higher computational cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repulsion-dispersion interactions, in both Stages 3 and 4, are calculated using the Buckingham potential under the pairwise additivity assumption. In contrast to C, N (Williams & Cox, 1984), O (Cox et al, 1981) and H (Williams & Cox, 1984;Coombes et al, 1996), for which transferable parameters for the Buckingham potential exist, parameters for sulfur are available only for specific sulfur/sulfur non-bonded interactions: the C-S-C bonding pattern (Lommerse et al, 2000), the S n pattern (Abraha & Williams, 1999), and the SO 2 Cpattern (Motherwell et al, 2002). Given ROY's molecular Rigid fragment definition for the ROY molecule, ensuring that the length of the intramolecular hydrogen bond (shown as dashed line) remains constant during the global search.…”
Section: Stage 2 -Choice Of Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimized parameters for sulphur interactions are further compared with two additional sets of parameters, namely those by No et al 70 (denoted as S-No) and by Abraha et al 71 (denoted as S-Ab). These alternative parameter sets are presented in Table 6.…”
Section: Optimized Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%