2005
DOI: 10.1086/430270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical Infall in G10.6-0.4: Accretion through an Ultracompact H ii Region

Abstract: We present high resolution (0. ′′ 12 × 0. ′′ 079) observations of the ultracompact Hii region G10.6-0.4 in 23 GHz radio continuum and the NH 3 (3,3) line. Our data show that the infall in the molecular material is largely spherical, and does not flatten into a molecular disk at radii as small as 0.03 pc. The spherical infall in the molecular gas matches in location and velocity the infall seen in the ionized gas. We use a non-detection to place a stringent upper limit on the mass of an expanding molecular shel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
73
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
73
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the three observed sources, we find indications of large scale molecular outflows in two sources (NGC 7538 and G28.2), as well as molecular infall signatures in two sources (NGC 7538 and G10.6). We note that while there is no large scale molecular outflow signature coming from G10.6, an ionized outflow has been previously detected in this region (Keto & Wood 2006) and despite our non-detection of infall in G28.2, an infall signature has been seen in the dense gas (NH 3 , Sollins et al 2005b) surrounding this region.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the three observed sources, we find indications of large scale molecular outflows in two sources (NGC 7538 and G28.2), as well as molecular infall signatures in two sources (NGC 7538 and G10.6). We note that while there is no large scale molecular outflow signature coming from G10.6, an ionized outflow has been previously detected in this region (Keto & Wood 2006) and despite our non-detection of infall in G28.2, an infall signature has been seen in the dense gas (NH 3 , Sollins et al 2005b) surrounding this region.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…That these two species show this absorption feature slightly redshifted from the source velocity suggests that perhaps the molecular gas is doing something different than the ionized gas. It should be noted that the NH 3 observations of (Sollins et al 2005b) for this source also show a similar velocity shift at high resolution for the molecular gas. The first moment map they present in Fig.…”
Section: G2820-005supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Is this scenario plausible? Indeed, in the case of G10.62-0.38, a massive star forming region with a luminosity of 9.2 × 10 5 L , Sollins et al (2005) suggest that within a radius of 0.03 pc, several O stars with a total mass of 175 M have formed at the center of a flattened disk. In our case, the existence of (at least) two high-mass YSOs close to the HMC center and separated (in projection) by only 0.…”
Section: Rotating Toroidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…disk solid angle. It also appears that the powerful ionizing fluxes from these OB-type stars are not sufficient to destroy the disk, which eventually turns into an ionized, rotating accretion flow close to the star (Sollins et al 2005;Keto 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, spatially disentangling such structures is a difficult task. While several disk candidates exist around early B-stars (e.g., Cesaroni et al 1997Cesaroni et al , 2005Schreyer et al 2002;Shepherd et al 2001;Zhang et al 2002;Chini et al 2004;Kraus et al 2010;Keto & Zhang 2010;Fallscheer et al 2011), more massive O-star like systems rather show larger-scale toroid-like structures not consistent with classical Keplerian accretion disks (e.g., Beltrán et al 2004;Beltrán et al 2011;Beuther et al 2005;Beuther & Walsh 2008;Sollins et al 2005;Keto & Wood 2006;Cesaroni et al 2007;Fallscheer et al 2009). However, the nondetection of Keplerian structures around O-stars does not imply that they do not exist, it rather indicates that they are likely on smaller spatial scales hidden by the toroids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%