2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2018)076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical transverse M5-branes from the plane wave matrix model

Abstract: We consider matrix theoretical description of transverse M5-branes in Mtheory on the 11-dimensional maximally supersymmetric pp-wave background. We apply the localization to the plane wave matrix model (PWMM) and show that the transverse spherical fivebranes with zero light cone energy in M-theory are realized as the distribution of low energy moduli of the SO(6) scalar fields in PWMM.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(111 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for µ ∼ 7.0 we find that there are two phase boundaries and a new phase appears characterised by the Myers cubic term 2 Related with the isometry part, the spherical shell distributions of S 2 and S 5 can be obtained in the BMN model in the limits where M2-and M5-branes are realised, respectively. The radii of these spheres completely agree with the M2 and M5 radii in the brane picture [15,16]. 3 A preliminary study of the BMN model concerning a phase transition was carried out in [17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, for µ ∼ 7.0 we find that there are two phase boundaries and a new phase appears characterised by the Myers cubic term 2 Related with the isometry part, the spherical shell distributions of S 2 and S 5 can be obtained in the BMN model in the limits where M2-and M5-branes are realised, respectively. The radii of these spheres completely agree with the M2 and M5 radii in the brane picture [15,16]. 3 A preliminary study of the BMN model concerning a phase transition was carried out in [17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We consider that extracting classical geometry by using our observables is not straightforward for such generic sector. This is because the matrix models generically contain higher energy modes than the supergravity and generic configurations of matrices contain contributions from the high energy modes [40][41][42]. Including those high energy modes, the classical geometric description will not be valid.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, we consider that in order to use our observables, it is first needed to find nice degrees of freedom which can probe the low energy physics. (In [41,42], such low energy description was found for a 1=4 BPS sector of the BMN matrix model.) It would be very interesting to find a numerical method of extracting proper low energy degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we regard the SO(6) symmetric uplift of ρ(m) to six dimensions as the geometry realised by φ . The solution to the uplift is a spherical shell distribution [43,44,19,20]:…”
Section: Pos(corfu2019)202mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the equivalence between the supergravity equations and the saddle point equations in the matrix model implies that there should be a brane picture and that the saddle point equations would also describe the geometry of the branes. It is seen from the localisation calculation that some solutions on the matrix-model side realise the spherical geometry of 5-branes or 2-branes with zero light-cone energy in M-theory [19,20]. These two emergence phenomena of geometries 3 , seen from the supersymmetric localisation calculation, only tell how the geometries embed in the BMN matrix model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%