1996
DOI: 10.21236/ada318975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical Waves in Saturated Sand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional form used by Equation (1) for the joint stiffness was chosen based on empirical data for quasi-static joint tests. To validate the model for a dynamic case, two sets of spherical wave experiments [31] performed at SRI with Salem limestone were simulated (one with a joint and the other one without). Radial velocity (along the joint surface) at various ranges was measured in these experiments as shown in Figure 6(I).…”
Section: Simulation Of Dynamic Experiments On Spherical Waves Propagamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional form used by Equation (1) for the joint stiffness was chosen based on empirical data for quasi-static joint tests. To validate the model for a dynamic case, two sets of spherical wave experiments [31] performed at SRI with Salem limestone were simulated (one with a joint and the other one without). Radial velocity (along the joint surface) at various ranges was measured in these experiments as shown in Figure 6(I).…”
Section: Simulation Of Dynamic Experiments On Spherical Waves Propagamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate, the joint model dynamic experiments 14 similar to ones described in the previous section, but with a smooth joint introduced into the sample, were simulated. The results of the simulations were reported in a previous paper 11.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the onset of yield measured in these tests for two different limestones is shown in Figure 1 with the marker points. The model was further calibrated to describe wave propagation in dynamic experiments 14. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Spark-Generated Bubbles [35] simulations include a 3DynaFS model [138]. • SRI Spherical Sand Shock [42] simulations include a DYSMAS/ELC model [13], and a CTH-EPIC model [13]. • Snay/Goertner Bubble [43] simulations include a 3DynaFS model [134][135][136][137][138], and an ALE3D model [105].…”
Section: Empirical Benchmark Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%