2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2019.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sphingolipids and the unfolded protein response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that SPHK2 is the main target responsible for the toxicity of SPHK inhibitors and further raise doubts on whether the S1P/ceramide balance is the main determinant of their toxicity. An alternative model is that this toxicity derives from perturbations in membrane fluidity generated after SPHK2 inhibition through the accumulation of ceramide, which would then activate the UPR and ISR (25,38). Moreover, while SPHK1 is predominantly cytoplasmic, SPHK2 is mainly associated to the ER and mitochondrial membranes (39), supporting a direct effect of SPHK2 inhibitors in the ER composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results indicate that SPHK2 is the main target responsible for the toxicity of SPHK inhibitors and further raise doubts on whether the S1P/ceramide balance is the main determinant of their toxicity. An alternative model is that this toxicity derives from perturbations in membrane fluidity generated after SPHK2 inhibition through the accumulation of ceramide, which would then activate the UPR and ISR (25,38). Moreover, while SPHK1 is predominantly cytoplasmic, SPHK2 is mainly associated to the ER and mitochondrial membranes (39), supporting a direct effect of SPHK2 inhibitors in the ER composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was accompanied by a deattachment of ribosomes from ER membranes, potentially contributing to the overall reduction in protein synthesis triggered by SKI-II. Nevertheless, changes in ER morphology can be produced directly by changes in the cellular lipid composition or as a consequence of an activation of PERK-dependent signaling of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) (25,26). To distinguish between these two possibilities, we compared the effects of SKI-II to those of Thapsigargin, a compound that inactivates Ca 2+ -dependent chaperones necessary for protein folding in the ER and thus activates the UPR (27).…”
Section: C) Supporting This View Transition Electron Microscopy (Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yeast cells lacking the ORM1 and ORM2 genes show a constitutive unfolded protein response, sensitivity to stress, and slow ER-to-Golgi transport [42]. ORM proteins function as the main regulators of the enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase-necessary for the process of sphingolipid biosynthesis, which is one of the main components of the cytoplasmic membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum, and disturbances in its homeostasis lead to ER stress [43]. The unfolded protein response can also alter sphingolipid metabolism.…”
Section: Upr Inflammation and Cholesterol And Bile Acid Metabolism mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unfolded protein response can also alter sphingolipid metabolism. Bi-directional interactions between sphingolipids and the UPR have now been observed in a range of diseases, including cancer, diabetes, and liver disease [43]. Other studies have shown that ER stress can directly initiate the proinflammatory pathways, while proinflammatory agents such as ROS, TLR ligands, and cytokines can induce ER stress.…”
Section: Upr Inflammation and Cholesterol And Bile Acid Metabolism mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These responses include the endoplasmic reticulum stress response and mtUPR [154]. Although it is beyond of the scope of these review, a relevant role of SLs has been reported in endoplasmic reticulum stress response involved in many metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases [155][156][157][158]. mtUPR is evolutionarily conserved and triggers a retrograde signaling pathway from mitochondria to the nucleus leading to the upregulation of chaperones in order to maintain mitochondrial protein homeostasis, when mitochondria have suffered perturbations in protein folding in oxidative phosphorylation or DNA damage.…”
Section: S1p Signaling In Mitochondriamentioning
confidence: 99%