2011
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spider-fed bromeliads: seasonal and interspecific variation in plant performance

Abstract: These results indicate that the mutualism between spiders and bromeliads is seasonally restricted, generating a conditional outcome. There was interspecific variation in nutrient uptake, probably related to each species' performance and photosynthetic pathways. Whereas B. balansae seems to use nitrogen for growth, Ae. distichantha apparently stores nitrogen for stressful nutritional conditions. Bromeliads absorbed more nitrogen coming from spider faeces than from flies, reinforcing the beneficial role played b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we analysed the combined effect of epiphyte size, spatial position and isolation on the species richness, the relative proportion of rare species, and the community similarity of epiphyte‐inhabiting spiders. Spiders and epiphytes have a mutualistic relationship in which the plants provide spiders with a suitable habitat for foraging, reproduction, egg laying, and finding shelter (Gonçalves‐Souza, Brescovit, Rossa‐Feres, & Romero, ; Scheffers, Edwards, Diesmos, Williams, & Evans, ), and spiders reduce herbivore populations through predation and can make nutrients available to the plants (e.g., via excretion) (Gonçalves, Mercier, Mazzafera, & Romero, ; Romero, Mazzafera, Vasconcellos‐Neto, & Trivelin, ). Spiders are highly sensitive to subtle changes in habitat structure (Gonçalves‐Souza et al., ) and microclimatic conditions and they show active habitat selection (Omena & Romero, ; Rao, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we analysed the combined effect of epiphyte size, spatial position and isolation on the species richness, the relative proportion of rare species, and the community similarity of epiphyte‐inhabiting spiders. Spiders and epiphytes have a mutualistic relationship in which the plants provide spiders with a suitable habitat for foraging, reproduction, egg laying, and finding shelter (Gonçalves‐Souza, Brescovit, Rossa‐Feres, & Romero, ; Scheffers, Edwards, Diesmos, Williams, & Evans, ), and spiders reduce herbivore populations through predation and can make nutrients available to the plants (e.g., via excretion) (Gonçalves, Mercier, Mazzafera, & Romero, ; Romero, Mazzafera, Vasconcellos‐Neto, & Trivelin, ). Spiders are highly sensitive to subtle changes in habitat structure (Gonçalves‐Souza et al., ) and microclimatic conditions and they show active habitat selection (Omena & Romero, ; Rao, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family Bromeliaceae has a significant ecological importance to the ecosystem where it is inserted due to the high number of interdependence relations that other organisms establish with species of this family, as well as the bromeliads with such organisms (Waser and Price, 1983;Romero and Vasconcellos-Neto, 2005;Gonçalves et al, 2011). Bromeliads are an important component in maintaining biological diversity (Siqueira Filho and Machado, 2001;Rios et al, 2010;Santana and Machado, 2010), since they provide shelter, serve as a substrate for foraging and even as a breeding site for many organisms (Ramalho et al, 2004;Romero and Vasconcellos-Neto, 2005;Andrade et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these arthropods complete their life-cycle on these plants, feeding at several trophic levels: on the plant, entrapped carrion, herbivores of the plant, and other predators (e.g., Be´renger and Pluot-Sigwalt 1997, Anderson 2005, Romero et al 2008, Voigt and Gorb 2008, Wheeler and Krimmel 2015. Second, a trend toward predator enrichment on carrion-covered plants has been shown in true carnivorous plants such as Pinguicula (Zamora 1990), and non-carnivorous plants such as the South African genus Roridula (Ellis andMidgley 1996, Anderson 2005), a glandular rhododendron (Sugiura and Yamazaki 2006), and a South American bromeliad (Gonc¸alves et al 2011). In both the bromeliad and Roridula systems, at least some of predator enhancement benefit comes from nutrients supplied by their feces (Ellis andMidgley 1996, Gonc¸alves et al 2011), though predators may also protect the plant from herbivores in 4 E-mail: lopresti.eric@gmail.com these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%