2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spider-Man, Magnets, and Urethral-cutaneous Fistula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 The authors did not mention if the magnets were high-strength neodymium magnetic beads. Rahman 2 reported the case of a 12-year-old boy that introduced a magnet in his anterior urethra and placed a second magnet at the same level on the ventral aspect of the penile shaft. Five days later, the magnet was found deeply embedded into the local tissues and attached to the intraurethral magnet, resulting in an urethrocutaneous fistula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 The authors did not mention if the magnets were high-strength neodymium magnetic beads. Rahman 2 reported the case of a 12-year-old boy that introduced a magnet in his anterior urethra and placed a second magnet at the same level on the ventral aspect of the penile shaft. Five days later, the magnet was found deeply embedded into the local tissues and attached to the intraurethral magnet, resulting in an urethrocutaneous fistula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications of selfinsertion of foreign bodies for the urethra are known as urethral injury, urethrocutaneous fistula, bladder perforation, and renal failure [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, decreased patient mental capacity or radiologically transparent objects can cause a foreign body to remain lodged for days, which can lead to the development of complications, such as urinary tract infections, perforation, fistulae, sepsis, or even penile necrosis [4,5]. Differentiating between patients with a known psychiatric history and those with no previous psychiatric issues is essential; whether a psychiatric evaluation should be performed on all patients to the irritation caused by the urethrovesical foreign body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%