2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-022-01584-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spider mite resistant maize lines, B75 and B96, maintain resistance under water-stress

Abstract: These two data sets highlight the spider mite responses of twospotted spider mite and Banks grass mite to varying water stress and maize inbred line in greenhouse trials and field trials. B73-B75-B96_Phenotypic_Measurements_Greenhouse.xlsx B73-B75-B96_Phenotypic_Measurements_FieldTrials.xlsxThese two data sets highlight the plant phenotypic/physiological responses of each maize inbred line to varying water stress in greenhouse trials and field trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest this could be the case for the host generalist TSM. For instance, when exposed to mite‐resistant maize lines (B96 and B75) TSM was highly sensitive to plant defence traits even with plant water stress, yet with a mite susceptible line (B73) plant water stress resulted in increased TSM populations (Gill et al., 2023). Moreover, BGM was less sensitive to mite resistant maize and water stress did not alter their response (Gill et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest this could be the case for the host generalist TSM. For instance, when exposed to mite‐resistant maize lines (B96 and B75) TSM was highly sensitive to plant defence traits even with plant water stress, yet with a mite susceptible line (B73) plant water stress resulted in increased TSM populations (Gill et al., 2023). Moreover, BGM was less sensitive to mite resistant maize and water stress did not alter their response (Gill et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil water content did not significantly affect taxonomic richness and abundance of total soil fauna community, and abundance of each taxon, except for Mesostigmata sp.3 in this study. Numerous studies have found that soil fauna, such as Collembola (Dombos, 2001), oribatid mites (Jakšová et al, 2020), and spider mites (Gill et al, 2023) respond to changes in soil water content. However, certain studies reported that soil water content did not affect soil fauna communities (Sinka et al, 2007;Gergocs and Hufnagel, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%