2010
DOI: 10.2528/pierc10100202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spiking Neural Networks for Breast Cancer Classification Using Radar Target Signatures

Abstract: Recent studies have shown that the dielectric properties of normal breast tissue vary considerably. This dielectric heterogeneity may mean that the identification of tumours using Ultra Wideband Radar imaging alone may be quite difficult. Significantly, since the dielectric properties of benign tissue were shown to overlap with those of malignant, breast tumour classification using traditional UWB Radar imaging algorithms could be very problematic. Rather than simply examining the dielectric properties of scat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UWB tumour classification was examined by Chen et al [44][45][46][47][48] and Teo et al [49] using tumours located in 2D breast models, while studies by Davis et al [30] and Conceição [51][52][53][54][55], McGinley et al [56], O'Halloran et al [57] and Alshehri et al [64] considered tumours in 3D breast models. The latter will not be further discussed in this study since discrimination between benign and malignant tumours is only assessed in terms of dielectric differences between the two types of tumours and does not address resulting tumour signatures due to different shapes, which is the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Combining Breast and Tumour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…UWB tumour classification was examined by Chen et al [44][45][46][47][48] and Teo et al [49] using tumours located in 2D breast models, while studies by Davis et al [30] and Conceição [51][52][53][54][55], McGinley et al [56], O'Halloran et al [57] and Alshehri et al [64] considered tumours in 3D breast models. The latter will not be further discussed in this study since discrimination between benign and malignant tumours is only assessed in terms of dielectric differences between the two types of tumours and does not address resulting tumour signatures due to different shapes, which is the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Combining Breast and Tumour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies by Conceição et al [51][52][53]55] and McGinley et al [56] a similar approach to that of Davis et al [30] is used. The main differences are the dimensions of the TF and SF regions, as illustrated in Figure 13.…”
Section: Combining Breast and Tumour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors analyzed the possible breast cancer risks using odds-ratio and risk-ratio analysis. McGinley et al [18] applied Spiking Neural Networks algorithm as a novel tumor classification method in classifying tumors as either benign or malignant cancer. The performance of the technique was rated to outperform the existing UWB Radar imaging algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These boundaries reflect UWB signals due to difference in dielectric properties between these various constituent tissues at microwave frequencies. The wide frequency-spectrum of the UWB signal means they are relatively robust to interference, while also allowing for very fine spatial resolution, making the technology ideal breast cancer detection and classification [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], heart and respiration monitoring [18][19][20][21]. Furthermore, UWB Radar uses low-power non-ionising radiation and is therefore a safe method for imaging and continuous monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%