2019
DOI: 10.1002/job.2363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spillover and crossover of work resources: A test of the positive flow of resources through work–family enrichment

Abstract: Summary In their seminal model of work–family enrichment, Greenhaus and Powell (2006) theorized five categories of work resources to have an impact on work–family enrichment. Using a matched set of 351 dual‐career spouses, we explored how these unique work resources contribute to work–family enrichment and how they spill over to shape job incumbents' family outcomes and cross over to spouse outcomes. Results support indirect effects for the work resources of developmental experiences, supervisor support, sched… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(155 reference statements)
4
80
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the direct paths between collaborative culture and BP ( clan bp = .03; p > .05) and between controlling culture and BP ( hier bp = .03; p > .05) are close to zero and not significant, while the direct effects of both collaborative culture and controlling culture on IMC ( clan imc = .52; p < .05; hier imc = .32; p < .05), and of IMC on BP ( imc bp = .57; p < .05) were significant. These results are in line with the recommendations of Baron and Kenny (1986) and other more recent publications (Shrout and Bolger, 2002;Alcántara-Pilar et al, 2018;Manzi et al, 2019;Carlson et al, 2019); and thus full mediation is deemed to exist.…”
Section: Table 4 About Heresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results show that the direct paths between collaborative culture and BP ( clan bp = .03; p > .05) and between controlling culture and BP ( hier bp = .03; p > .05) are close to zero and not significant, while the direct effects of both collaborative culture and controlling culture on IMC ( clan imc = .52; p < .05; hier imc = .32; p < .05), and of IMC on BP ( imc bp = .57; p < .05) were significant. These results are in line with the recommendations of Baron and Kenny (1986) and other more recent publications (Shrout and Bolger, 2002;Alcántara-Pilar et al, 2018;Manzi et al, 2019;Carlson et al, 2019); and thus full mediation is deemed to exist.…”
Section: Table 4 About Heresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results extend previous research on the positive synergistic potential of work to home, which highlights the positive view of daily WFF as an antecedent of recovery experiences. Most research focuses on the positive side of WFF in terms of well-being outcomes (Wendsche and Lohmann-Haislah, 2017;Bennett et al, 2018;Carlson et al, 2019;Jiao and Lee, 2020), while less attention has been given to exploring the positive aspects of WFF as an antecedent of recovery. Our results reveal that WFF is crucial to the day-to-day recovery process, implying that employees who achieve a positive transference of system functioning from work to the home domain may experience a daily process of restoring resources during off-job time.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, previous studies show that supervisor’s support could effectively alleviate employee perceived WFC [ 43 ]. In Chinese organizations dominated by differential patterns, supervisors would provide more support to “in-group” subordinates who are close to them [ 49 ], thus reducing the negative spillover of subordinates in the work [ 40 , 62 ], further alleviating their WFC. Finally, work/family border theory shows that the relationship between border-crossers (individuals who frequently move between work and family) and border-keepers (members who have particular influence on defining the border) could affect work-family balance [ 18 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, according to work-family spillover theory, individuals bring their attitudes, emotions, and behaviors generated at work into their family field. These attitudes, emotions, and behaviors can be positive or negative, and WFC is the product of negative spillover [ 62 ]. Lacking work support, experiencing excessive work pressure and negative emotions all lead to negative spillover causing WFC [ 63 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%