Spillover effects from unintended trials on attitude and behavior: Promoting new products through access‐based services

Abstract

Access-based services (ABS) provide an opportunity for brands to promote their new products by enabling (unintended) trials. However, the mechanisms and impact of consumer exposure to products in ABS and the subsequent potential spillover effects on both the brand and the product perception are largely unknown.Our hypotheses are derived from the information integration theory (IIT) and subsequently tested. Study 1 is a field study investigating an unintended trial moderated by involvement and positive experience. The results indicate the positive effects of the unintended trial on product and brand attitudes, brand purchase intention, and word of mouth. In line with IIT, these effects are more pronounced for positive trial experience, although in contrast to IIT, they are less pronounced for high-involvement consumers. While the results of Study 2, an online experiment, show substantial effects of both trials compared with nontrials, they also reveal that intended and unintended trials have a similar impact on attitude, but ABS experiences have a stronger positive impact on brand purchase intention. We thus recommend that brand managers promote not only new products but also their brands in unintended trials. This study fills a gap in current discussions about the trial effect(s) of ABS. K E Y W O R D Saccess-based services, attitudinal change, e-mobility, field study, information integration theory, involvement, trial effects, unintended trial, word of mouth (WOM)

Factors Affecting Electric Bike Adoption: Seeking an Energy-Efficient Solution for the Post-COVID Era

“…Concerning the financial perception (H3 and H4) and capacity factors (H5 and H6) of the bike, Lehr et al (2020) confirmed that user involvement could increase intentions, but how? Therefore, parallel to their suggestion of using information integration theory, our study also supports that Chinese policies should try to offer the maximum unintended trial by explaining our research insights.…”

The sharing economy at the base of the economic pyramid: How access‐based services can help overcome ownership risks

“…The sharing economy has gained increasing attention as an alternative to ownership‐centric modes of consumption. Defined as “a scalable socioeconomic system that employs technology‐enabled platforms to provide users with temporary access to tangible and intangible resources” (Eckhardt et al, 2019, p. 7), it comprises a variety of business models, such as peer‐to‐peer sharing platforms (e.g., Benoit et al, 2017; Stofberg & Bridoux, 2019), access‐based services from professional service providers, such as car sharing or fashion rentals (e.g., Lehr et al, 2020), or business‐to‐business services that replace ownership of industrial machinery (e.g., Schaefers et al, 2021). Although the COVID‐19 pandemic has severely affected some sharing economy business models, such as accommodation and transportation, the ongoing digital transformation appears to continue to drive the adoption of access‐as‐a‐service in a post‐pandemic world (Batool et al, 2020; Hossain, 2021; Meenakshi, 2021).…”

Effects of consumer–cause fit and consumer–product fit of cause‐related marketing on product purchase intention

“…S = stimuli, Ψ = goal-oriented values of the stimuli, ρ = unitary response, R = observable response (Anderson, 2016;Klitzner & Anderson, 1977). In contrast, most studies of product evaluations and attitude changes have applied the adding or averaging law (Anderson, 1965;Lehr, Buettgen, Benoit, & Merfeld, 2020;Schumann, Wünderlich, & Evanschitzky, 2014;Simonin & Ruth, 1998). Anderson (2013Anderson ( , 2016 also noted that the application of the averaging law has been by far the most frequent overall.…”

“…Researchers have mostly applied the multiplying law to studies of behaviour under uncertainty, such as gambling or gaming, where expected outcome is multiplied by expected probability to determine behavioural tendency (Anderson, 2016; Klitzner & Anderson, 1977). In contrast, most studies of product evaluations and attitude changes have applied the adding or averaging law (Anderson, 1965; Lehr, Buettgen, Benoit, & Merfeld, 2020; Schumann, Wünderlich, & Evanschitzky, 2014; Simonin & Ruth, 1998). Anderson (2013, 2016) also noted that the application of the averaging law has been by far the most frequent overall.…”