Spillovers from Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau Investment and from Other Foreign Investment in Chinese Industries

Huang, Jr‐Tsung

doi:10.1093/cep/byh002

Cited by 53 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using provincial data, Huang (2004) found that the presence of HMT firms has positive effect on TFP at the province-level but found no such effect for non-HMT firms. Lin et al (2009) more recently reported negative horizontal spillover from HMT firms to domestic firms but positive spillover from non-HMT firms.…”

Section: The Origin Of Fiesmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The extent of such spillovers is also shown to be shaped by the ownership structure (Jarvoick and Spartareanu, 2008), or the origin of FIEs (Huang, 2004). Meanwhile, Todo and Miyamoto (2006) found significant spillovers only from FIEs that perform R&D activities in the host country, suggesting that spillovers can be fairly different depending on the type of activity engaged by FIEs and their R&D activity rather their production may be the important source of spillover.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How do Chinese industries benefit from FDI spillovers?

Ito

Yashiro

et al. 2012

China Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, Foreign Invested Enterprises (FIEs) in China have increased their investment in not only production activity but also R&D activity. This paper examines the impact of spillovers from such activities on two types of innovations by Chinese domestic firms: Total Factor Productivity (TFP) and invention patent application, using comprehensive industry and province-level data. We evaluate such spillovers according to FIEs' ownership structure, the origin of foreign funds, and the type of their activity: R&D, and production. We find an interesting asymmetry between spillovers to TFP and patent application：while we do not find significant intra-industry spillovers from FIEs, which is in line with previous studies, we find robust inter-industries spillover on TFP. On the other hand, we find substantial intra-industry spillovers promoting invention patent application but no evidence of inter-industries spillovers. Furthermore, whereas spillovers from FIEs to Chinese firms' TFP stem from their production activities, the source of spillovers to invention patent application is mostly through their R&D activity. Our findings indicate a need for multi-dimensional evaluation on the role of FDI in developing countries.Keywords: China, FDI spillovers, R&D, Innovation JEL classifications: O12;O3;F23;O53 This paper is one of the products of DRC-RIETI joint research. We are grateful to Masahisa Fujita, Masayuki Morikawa and participants of the DRC-RIETI joint workshop at RIETI and DRC for their valuable comments. Remaining errors are those of the authors. The opinions expressed in this paper do not reflect those of RIETI or DRC of the State Council,

show abstract

Section: The Origin Of Fiesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How do Chinese industries benefit from FDI spillovers?

Ito

Yashiro

et al. 2012

China Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Insofar as foreign capital is concerned, FDI inflows are likely to complement private capital formation if they bring needed financing and transfer managerial and technological knowhow (see Huang, 2004). In this connection, the impact of remittance flows will be beneficial to long-term growth if, like FDI inflows, they contribute to financing private capital formation and are directed to investments in human capital and economic infrastructure rather than consumption expenditures per se.…”

Section: Business and Economic Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remittances and Economic Growth in Mexico: An Empirical Study with Structural Breaks, 1970-2010

Ramírez

2014

Business and Economic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates remittance flows to Mexico during the 1980-2010 period in absolute terms, relative to GDP, in comparison to FDI inflows, and in terms of their regional destination. Next, the paper reviews the growing literature that assesses the impact of remittances on investment spending and economic growth. Third, it presents a simple endogenous growth model that explicitly incorporates the potential impact of remittance flows on economic and labor productivity growth. Fourth, it presents a modified empirical counterpart to the simple model that tests for both single-and two-break unit root tests, as well as performs cointegration tests with an endogenously determined level shift over the 1970-2010 period. The error-correction model estimates suggest that remittance flows to Mexico have a positive and significant effect, albeit small, on both economic growth and labor productivity growth. The concluding section summarizes the major results and discusses potential avenues for future research on this important topic.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the cooperation between the innovations of local organizations and global technology spillovers sources has not yet been discovered in high tech sectors of emergent countries (Liu & Buck, 2007). In innovation development, FDI was found to be an important factor, whichever positive (Chuang & Hsu, 2004;Liu & Wang, 2003) or negative (Hu & Jefferson, 2002;Huang, 2004;Liu & Wang, 2003). FDI may additionally bring advancement in knowledge, advancement in management talent, financial capital, human capital and new innovation concepts (Branstetter, 2006;Hu & www.ccsenet.org/ass Asian Social Science Vol.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evaluation of Innovation Capacity of China and Its Influencing Factors

Usman¹,

Liu²,

Anjum³

et al. 2015

ASS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to explore the factors affecting the national innovation capacity (NIC) of China. NIC is the capability of a nation to manufacture & commercialize the stream of innovation technology over the "long term". The NIC of a country depicts not only industrial competitiveness of a country via a direct impact on the global market share of high tech products, but also determines its future potential for economic development. National innovation capacity depends upon the strength of national common innovation infrastructure, the industrial cluster innovation environment & therefore the strength of association among these two. Since reform and opening up of China, China innovation capability has made tremendous achievements, but the quality of the main innovation output is yet needed to be improved. The factors affecting the China's national innovation capacity include great human resource advantage of China, science & technology infrastructure and a high capacity to absorb international technology spillovers. But the industry cluster innovation environment, still not provide enough support to knowledge-intensive services.

show abstract

Spillovers from Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau Investment and from Other Foreign Investment in Chinese Industries

Cited by 53 publications

References 19 publications

How do Chinese industries benefit from FDI spillovers?

How do Chinese industries benefit from FDI spillovers?

Remittances and Economic Growth in Mexico: An Empirical Study with Structural Breaks, 1970-2010

The Evaluation of Innovation Capacity of China and Its Influencing Factors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About