“…The literature in SCO is dominated by Fe II compounds, which is due in part to its easily distinguished spin states, ,, although Fe III also has been well-studied. ,,, Recent studies have highlighted magnetostructural dependence arising from the delicate interplay of substituent, anion and solvent selection on the exhibition and behavior of SCO in Fe III mononuclear complexes. − Practically, Fe III is a good candidate for use in devices, because it is not susceptible to oxidation, and its 3d 5 electron configuration gives rise to a strong magnetic signal in the HS state ( S = 5/2), with a comparatively weak signal in LS ( S = 1/2) . Coordination spheres that have been shown to favor SCO in Fe III compounds include N 2 O 2 S 2 , N 3 O 2 S, N 5 O , and N 6 , although the most commonly reported example is N 4 O 2 . ,, One ligand archetype which affords this coordination environment is the H 2 Salen family, which has been shown to enable SCO in Fe III and other metals. ,− Studies have investigated the effect of the tetraamine backbone length on the spin state. , Common variations of the tetraamine backbone include the following: sal 2 222, sal 2 232, and sal 2 323 (Figure ). Various Fe III complexes of sal 2 222, sal 2 232, and sal 2 323 have been shown to exhibit SCO behavior, with the latter most often residing in LS up to ambient temperatures, with a few examples of SCO above room temperature. ,,, …”