2011
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/295/1/012094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin dependence of the antinucleon-nucleon interaction

Abstract: Abstract. The status of our present knowledge on the antinucleon-nucleon interaction at low and medium energies is discussed. Special emphasis is put on aspects related to its spin dependence which are relevant for experiments planned by the PAX collaboration. Predictions for the spin-dependentpp cross sections σ1 and σ2 are presented, utilizingN N potential models developed by the Jülich group, and compared to results based on the amplitudes of the Nijmegen partial-wave analysis.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results for the total and integrated elastic (pp) and charge-exchange (pp →nn) cross sections and also for angular-dependent observables for both models can be found in Refs. [11,13,26]. Evidently, with model A as well as with D a very good overall reproduction of the low-and intermediate-energyNN data was achieved.…”
Section: Results Forp 3 He Andp 4 He Based On the Glauber-sitenkmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results for the total and integrated elastic (pp) and charge-exchange (pp →nn) cross sections and also for angular-dependent observables for both models can be found in Refs. [11,13,26]. Evidently, with model A as well as with D a very good overall reproduction of the low-and intermediate-energyNN data was achieved.…”
Section: Results Forp 3 He Andp 4 He Based On the Glauber-sitenkmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As was shown in Refs. [9,11] on the basis of the Glauber-Sitenko theory [13,14] with elementary pN amplitudes taken from the Jülich N N models [15][16][17][18], the pd interaction could provide a comparable or even more effective way than the pp interaction to obtain polarized antiprotons. This conjecture can be checked at a planned experiment [19] at the AD (Antiproton Decelerator) facility at CERN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the methods developed in Refs. [51][52][53][54][55][56] to calculate the buildup of polarization of an antiproton beam. We present results for antiproton laboratory momenta from 100 to 1000 MeV/c and for typical acceptance angles θ lab acc = 5, 10, 20, and 30 mrad in the laboratory frame.…”
Section: Towards Polarized Antiprotonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results can be compared to the model calculations of Refs. [53][54][55]. We assume that the polarization buildup due to the filtering mechanism dominates and that spin-flip mechanisms in the beam can be neglected [52].…”
Section: Towards Polarized Antiprotonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This option was discussed in our paper [8] within the singlescattering approximation. The spin dependence of the elementary pN amplitudes was taken into account only in collinear kinematics using the N N interaction model of the Jülich group [9,10,11,12] and total spin-dependent cross sections were calculated for energies in the region 50-300 MeV using the generalized optical theorem. A very similar analysis was performed by us for p 3 He elastic scattering and the corresponding total cross sections were calculated [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%