2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin distribution of evaporation residues formed in complete and incomplete fusion in 16 O+ 154 Sm system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where μ is the reduced mass, E is the center of mass energy of projectile and V c is the Coulomb barrier, and (ii) mass asymmetry of the system, μ A = M T −M P M T +M P where M T and M P is the mass of target and projectile respectively, for different projectile-target combinations [54,55,[64][65][66]. In figure 7, the ratio are plotted as a function of (a) relative velocity (v rel ), and (b) mass asymmetry of the system (μ A ).…”
Section: Localization Of -Window and Entrance-channel Dependence Of Icfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where μ is the reduced mass, E is the center of mass energy of projectile and V c is the Coulomb barrier, and (ii) mass asymmetry of the system, μ A = M T −M P M T +M P where M T and M P is the mass of target and projectile respectively, for different projectile-target combinations [54,55,[64][65][66]. In figure 7, the ratio are plotted as a function of (a) relative velocity (v rel ), and (b) mass asymmetry of the system (μ A ).…”
Section: Localization Of -Window and Entrance-channel Dependence Of Icfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 9(a), the projectile-target combinations are shown by different symbols-filled circles represent 12 C + 169 Tm at E lab ≈ 67-90 MeV (present work and [55]), half-filled circles represent 16 O + 159 Tb at E lab ≈ 83-97 MeV [65], filled square represents 16 O + 169 Tm at E lab ≈ 87.6 MeV [54], filled hexagon represents 16 O + 154 Sm [66], and half-filled square represents 16 O + 124 Sn [64] at E lab ≈ 97.6 MeV. As can be seen from this figure, there is a linear increase in the value of ratio with v rel for 12 C + 169 Tm and 16 O + 159 Tb.…”
Section: Localization Of -Window and Entrance-channel Dependence Of Icfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At energies near and above the Coulomb barrier, complete fusion (CF) is expected to be the dominant reaction mode. However, in the past few decades a number of studies had confirmed that incomplete fusion (ICF) also contributes at such energies [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Britt and Quinton et al [7] first studied ICF reactions in the early sixties, where they experimentally observed fast α-particles in the reaction of 12 C, 14 N and 16 O projectiles with 209 Bi and 197 Au target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies were carried out at beam energies greater than 10 MeV/nucleon. In recent decades, a measurable ICF probability fraction (F ICF (%)) in the energy range 4-7 MeV/nucleon has also been observed which makes it significantly interesting to study dynamics of these reactions [1][2][3][4][11][12][13][14][15]. In the CF reactions, the projectile completely fuses with the target nucleus and forms a compound nucleus (CN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measurements have shown that 9 Be breakup occurs predominantly via an excited 8 Be nucleus [17], so this approximation is justified. The use of 20 Ne has not been examined thoroughly in current research, since most ICF experimental research uses projectiles with Z10 such as 9 Be, 12 C, 14 N, 16 O and 19 F against medium to heavy targets [5,[18][19][20][21][22]. The result of its breakup is interesting because of the much larger 16 O cluster that provides additional torque to the fusing α nucleus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%