2009
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/37/375401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin injection in lateral InAs quantum dot structures by optical orientation spectroscopy

Abstract: Abstract. Optical spin injection is studied in novel laterally arranged self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dot structures, by using optical orientation measurements in combination with tuneable laser spectroscopy. It is shown that spins of uncorrelated free carriers are better conserved during the spin injection than the spins of correlated electrons and holes in an exciton. This is attributed to efficient spin relaxation promoted by the electron-hole exchange interaction of the excitons. Our finding suggests th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 However, there is still a need to take a closer look at the spin states during the injection of spin-polarized carriers or excitons, i.e., spin injection from a layered semiconductor barrier into a QD. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Such spin injection has the potential to provide the key to applying the spin states of QDs to spin-functional optical devices, as one would need to inject spin-polarized carriers from electrodes into QDs to achieve a practical device structure. Indeed, spin-polarized light emitting diodes and lasers based on QDs have been discussed; [11][12][13][14] however, spin injection is recognized as being much more difficult than spin-independent carrier injection due to the relative instability of the spin states in layered semiconductors, which allows them to easily relax during the injection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 However, there is still a need to take a closer look at the spin states during the injection of spin-polarized carriers or excitons, i.e., spin injection from a layered semiconductor barrier into a QD. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Such spin injection has the potential to provide the key to applying the spin states of QDs to spin-functional optical devices, as one would need to inject spin-polarized carriers from electrodes into QDs to achieve a practical device structure. Indeed, spin-polarized light emitting diodes and lasers based on QDs have been discussed; [11][12][13][14] however, spin injection is recognized as being much more difficult than spin-independent carrier injection due to the relative instability of the spin states in layered semiconductors, which allows them to easily relax during the injection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For excitation at energies higher than XL, e.g., when both hh and lh bands of the WL are involved, a lower spin polarization of photogenerated carriers is expected as both spin orientations are simultaneously created. 13 Indeed, the highest PL polarization degree was observed for excitation within the hh part of the WL alone. Under simultaneous excitation from both hh and lh bands in the WL, PL polarization is significantly reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With polarized nonresonant excitation, spin-polarized carriers are injected from the surrounding barrier into the QDs, and the initial spin coherence likely deteriorates during intra-relaxation through various elastic and inelastic scatterings with phonons. Because the exciton states are vulnerable to spin flip due to the electron-hole exchange interaction, it is known that the spins of uncorrelated separate electrons and holes are better conserved during spin injection than the spins of correlated electrons and holes in an exciton, and the same tendency was observed in different structures such as in QDs, laterally coupled QDs, and quantum rings 28 . Second, nonresonantly excited carriers are also known to affect the electric dipole of excitons via coherent many-body interactions in various quantum confinement structures [29][30][31] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%