2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin–Orbit Couplings for Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics at the ΔSCF Level

Abstract: A procedure for the calculation of spin–orbit coupling (SOC) at the delta self-consistent field (ΔSCF) level of theory is presented. Singlet and triplet excited electronic states obtained with the ΔSCF method are expanded into a linear combination of singly excited Slater determinants composed of ground electronic state Kohn–Sham orbitals. This alleviates the nonorthogonality between excited and ground electronic states and introduces a framework, similar to the auxiliary wave function at the time-dependent de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the triplet has been found to be a reasonable proxy for modeling CTTS dynamics . Spin–orbit corrections have been introduced for ROKS simulations only very recently, and these effects are neglected here. Experimentally, the spin–orbit coupling splits the CTTS spectrum of I – (aq) into 2 P 3/2 and 2 P 1/2 bands centered at 5.5 and 6.44 eV, respectively .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the triplet has been found to be a reasonable proxy for modeling CTTS dynamics . Spin–orbit corrections have been introduced for ROKS simulations only very recently, and these effects are neglected here. Experimentally, the spin–orbit coupling splits the CTTS spectrum of I – (aq) into 2 P 3/2 and 2 P 1/2 bands centered at 5.5 and 6.44 eV, respectively .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the states are optimized independently and, therefore, not orthogonal, which, in principle, results in a non-Hermitian spin-orbit coupling operator, a recently developed methodology to project the excited state Slater-determinants of corresponding ΔSCF states onto a linear combination of singly excited Slater determinants allows for the calculation of observables where two excited electronic states are involved. 106 The ΔSCF KS determinant (|ψ i ⟩) mapping the electronic density of state i can be expanded as a linear combination of configuration state functions…”
Section: δScf Methodology For Namdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. 106 Analogously, the UV-absorption spectra of the first singlet excited state of a cyclopropanone molecule in vacuum and in aqueous solution were calculated at the ΔSCF level of theory by approximating the transition dipole moment (with electric dipole operator μ) between the ground and S1 states using the CIS expansion of the S1 excited electronic state density,…”
Section: δScf Methodology For Namdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will refer to a molecular configuration in which multiple mean-field solutions start to appear as a symmetry-breaking onset (SBO). As the ultimate goal of variational excited state calculations is often the simulation of dynamics in the excited state, , it is important to ensure that the calculations converge on the solution providing the appropriate value of the energy and atomic forces. While the ground state solution can, by the minimum energy principle, be identified as the one with the lowest energy, an analogous selection principle cannot be used for tracking excited state solutions. , In previous work, we have demonstrated that the mean-field solution for the doubly excited state of ethylene giving the best description of the energy curve along the double bond torsion can be identified based on the conservation of the saddle point order as the wave function undergoes symmetry breaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%