Iron(V)-nitrido and -oxo complexes
have been proposed as key intermediates
in a diverse array of chemical transformations. Herein we present
a detailed electronic-structure analysis of [Fe
V
(N)(TPP)]
(
1
, TPP
2–
= tetraphenylporphyrinato),
and [Fe
V
(N)(cyclam-ac)]
+
(
2
, cyclam-ac
= 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1-acetato) using electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) and
57
Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy
coupled with wave function based complete active-space self-consistent
field (CASSCF) calculations. The findings were compared with all other
well-characterized genuine iron(V)-nitrido and -oxo complexes, [Fe
V
(N)(MePy
2
tacn)](PF
6
)
2
(
3
, MePy
2
tacn = methyl-
N
′,
N
″-bis(2-picolyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane), [Fe
V
(N){PhB(
t-
BuIm)
3
}]
+
(
4
, PhB(
t
BuIm)
3
–
= phenyltris(3-
tert
-butylimidazol-2-ylidene)borate),
and [Fe
V
(O)(TAML)]
−
(
5
,
TAML
4–
= tetraamido macrocyclic ligand). Our results
revealed that complex
1
is an authenticated iron(V)-nitrido
species and contrasts with its oxo congener, compound I, which contains
a ferryl unit interacting with a porphyrin radical. More importantly,
tetragonal iron(V)-nitrido and -oxo complexes
1
–
3
and
5
all possess an orbitally nearly doubly
degenerate
S
= 1/2 ground state. Consequently, analogous
near-axial EPR spectra with
g
||
<
g
⊥
≤ 2 were measured for them,
and their
g
||
and
g
⊥
values were found to obey a simple relation of
g
⊥
2
+ (2 –
g
∥
)
2
= 4. However, the bonding situation for trigonal iron(V)-nitrido
complex
4
is completely different as evidenced by its
distinct EPR spectrum with
g
||
< 2
<
g
⊥
. Further in-depth analyses
suggested that tetragonal low spin iron(V)-nitrido and -oxo complexes
feature electronic structures akin to those found for complexes
1
–
3
and
5
. Therefore, the
characteristic EPR signals determined for
1
–
3
and
...