2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.224433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin susceptibility and superexchange interaction in the antiferromagnet CuO

Abstract: Evidence for the quasi one-dimensional (1D) antiferromagnetism of CuO is presented in a framework of Heisenberg model. We have obtained an experimental absolute value of the paramagnetic spin susceptibility of CuO by subtracting the orbital susceptibility separately from the total susceptibility through the 63 Cu NMR shift measurement, and compared directly with the theoretical predictions. The result is best described by a 1D S = 1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg (AFH) model, supporting the speculation invoked… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
13
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitted J 1 = -51 meV is in a good agreement with J=67±20 retrieved from neutron scattering experiments [4]. The fitted value of J 2 =8.6 meV, is only about 1/6 of |J 1 |, consistent with quasi-1D model [25], and the fitted value of J 7 =9.87 meV. The fitted intersublattice coupling values J 3 =4.9 meV and J 4 =7 meV are weak, because the Cu-O-Cu bond angles are close to 90…”
Section: −5åsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fitted J 1 = -51 meV is in a good agreement with J=67±20 retrieved from neutron scattering experiments [4]. The fitted value of J 2 =8.6 meV, is only about 1/6 of |J 1 |, consistent with quasi-1D model [25], and the fitted value of J 7 =9.87 meV. The fitted intersublattice coupling values J 3 =4.9 meV and J 4 =7 meV are weak, because the Cu-O-Cu bond angles are close to 90…”
Section: −5åsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…• for these two Js [25].In AFM1 and AFM2 phases, symmetry causes additional mutual cancelation of J 3 and J 4 ; therefore, the energy cost of chain II rotation is low, as was discussed in the previous paragraph. We also calculate the next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) interactions J 5 , J 6 .…”
Section: −5åmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this 2D CuO thin film, the existence of mix valence states and induced defects would be benefit to breaking the long rang magnetic order and forming short-range magnetic order in a wide temperature range, which may induce magnetic fluctuation and enhance magnetic frustration that tends to form a non-collinear spin order at high 6 temperature. This point is consistent with the fact that the short-range magnetic order still remains at high temperature (>550K) and a broadened , 0, peak had been observed even at 290 K in neutron scattering study of 3D CuO single crystal [8,11,12,[30][31][32]. [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Note that the fit to the reduced temperature depends on j/J rather than J. Neutron scattering has determined J 1 to be between À 75 and À 80 meV, with J 2 ¼ 5 and J 7 ¼ 3 meV 24,43 . Other measurements include |J 1 | ¼ 77 meV from susceptibility 44 , and |J 1 | ¼ 100 meV from mid-infrared conductivity 45 and Raman spectra 46 . Recent DFT calculations have yielded values for J 1 ranging from À 51 to À 127 meV 23,28 .…”
Section: Roommentioning
confidence: 99%