1980
DOI: 10.1139/v80-125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin trapping for hydroxyl in water: a kinetic evaluation of two popular traps

Abstract: . Can. J. Chem. 58,803 (1980). Two spin traps. 4-(N-methy1pyridinium)tert-butyl nitrone (4-MePyBN) and 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide (DMPO) were examined for their effectiveness at trapping hydroxyl in water. At pH 6 and 22"C, rate constants for trapping hydroxyl were found to be 0.5 x 109 M-I s-I (4-MePyBN) and 2.0 x lo9 1M-I s-l (DMPO). The hydroxyl adduct of DMPO decayed by a firqt order process with a half-life of 870 s. This was at least three times greater than that of the 4-MePyBN adduct. These and o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 were calculated with k DMPO =2.0×10 9 M "1 s "1 . This value is identical to that measured by spin trapping, 22) although a diŠerent method was applied. Therefore, it is conclusive that DMPO acted as an OH scavenger.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Consumption Of Dissolved Oxygensupporting
confidence: 73%
“…6 were calculated with k DMPO =2.0×10 9 M "1 s "1 . This value is identical to that measured by spin trapping, 22) although a diŠerent method was applied. Therefore, it is conclusive that DMPO acted as an OH scavenger.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Consumption Of Dissolved Oxygensupporting
confidence: 73%
“…3). The half-lives of DMPO-OH 5 or DMPO-OOH 6,7 at basic pH are much shorter than those at neutral or acidic conditions, and the decrease of the intensity of DMPO-OH signal can be considered as the unstability of these radical species. The optimum pH was found to be around pH 8.5, thus, the catalytic action of H + may not be plausible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate constant of trapping OH-by DMPO, 2.1-5.7 x 109 M-1'sec-1 (16,21,22), is also much greater than those of O2-(10 M-1 sec'-), and HOO-(6.6 x 103 M-1 sec-1) (22). In view of these data, the major product of the reaction is°27/HO2', at least 105-fold more concentrated than OH-radical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%