2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.012414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-wave dispersion in half-dopedLa32Sr12NiO4

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The large value obtained for the intrinsic SOC is surprising as it is an order of magnitude larger than the largest theoretical estimate [16] and up to 3 orders of magnitude larger than other results [14,25,26]). However, given that the experimental µ dependence of Γ s dictates the dominant role of the intrinsic coupling, L i yields necessarily a large value.…”
contrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large value obtained for the intrinsic SOC is surprising as it is an order of magnitude larger than the largest theoretical estimate [16] and up to 3 orders of magnitude larger than other results [14,25,26]). However, given that the experimental µ dependence of Γ s dictates the dominant role of the intrinsic coupling, L i yields necessarily a large value.…”
contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Γ = 75 meV, that is independent of µ, was used for the calculated curves. First principles calculations of the intrinsic SOC scatter more than two orders of magnitude with values of 0.9 µeV [14,25,26]), 24 µeV [15], and 200 µeV [16]. Values for the BR SOC, L BR = κE, vary between κ = 10..36 µeV/(V/nm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have revealed that the intrinsic contribution can be dominant for AHE in metals when the σ xy is of the order of 10 3 (Ωcm) −1 and the conductivity σ xx is in the range of ∼ 10 4 −10 6 Ω −1 cm −1 [20]. This dominant contribution of intrinsic mechanism is confirmed by the detailed comparisons between the first-principles calculations [21,22,23] and experiments [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In III-V semiconductors, it is the large spin-orbit splitting of the valence band states [1] that enables efficient optical pumping of electron [2] or nuclear spins [3,4] and leads to a strong correlation between light helicity and electron-spin orientation [5]. In this context, one would argue that optical spin manipulation would be hindered in semiconducting single-wall carbon nanotubes (CNTs): Due to the weak spin-orbit splitting in graphene [6] and early experiments suggesting the presence of electron-hole symmetry [7], it had been assumed that SOI in CNTs would be small for both electrons and holes. In addition, the depolarization effect ensures that only electric fields linearly polarized along the CNT axis couple strongly to electrons and holes [8,9], ruling out the possibility of obtaining correlations between electron spin and photon polarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%