2005
DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2005.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spina bifida – a follow-up study of neonates born from 1991 to 2001

Abstract: Myelomeningocoele is associated with high rates of mortality and severe psychomotoric retardation. The localization of the lesion has an impact on survival rate and sphincter control. Mental development depends on neonatal condition after delivery. Mode of delivery does not influence the child's further development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are four main lesion levels: (1) cervical, which affects the nerves in the neck; (2) thoracic, which affects the nerves in the upper torso downward; (3) lumbar, which affects the nerves in the lower torso downward; and (4) sacral, which affects the nerves at the very bottom of the spine (Walker and Peterson 2008). Lesion level has been associated with survival and impairments, most frequently in sphincter control (Preis et al 2005;Verhoef et al 2006). In particular, most individuals with low lesion levels are ambulatory whereas most of those with higher level lesions do not walk unaided (Verhoef et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four main lesion levels: (1) cervical, which affects the nerves in the neck; (2) thoracic, which affects the nerves in the upper torso downward; (3) lumbar, which affects the nerves in the lower torso downward; and (4) sacral, which affects the nerves at the very bottom of the spine (Walker and Peterson 2008). Lesion level has been associated with survival and impairments, most frequently in sphincter control (Preis et al 2005;Verhoef et al 2006). In particular, most individuals with low lesion levels are ambulatory whereas most of those with higher level lesions do not walk unaided (Verhoef et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los niños presentaban similares antecedentes mórbidos y/o secuelas que en otras series 2,7,8,9,22,23 , sin embargo, existía un mayor porcentaje de escoliosis (100%) y de invalidez (85%) 2,7,8,9,22,23 , lo que podría explicar en cierta forma el porcentaje marginalmente mayor de Pimax demostrada en el estudio de Sherman y colaboradores 10 . Los estudios sobre función pulmonar en pacientes con MMC son muy limitados, en especial cuando se hace mención a la capacidad inspiratoria 10,11 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Los casos analizados son de 12 a 14, nosotros enrolamos un número similar de sujetos. Este reducido núme-ro de casos no nos permite realizar otros análi-sis estadísticos confiables; por otro lado, la colaboración no siempre es posible por sus alteraciones neuromusculares y mentales 22 . Debemos considerar que no es una patología que con frecuencia se le de importancia a las consecuencias sobre el sistema respiratorio 2 hasta el momento en que se toman decisiones como corrección quirúrgica de escoliosis, lo que explica que todos nuestros niños presentaran algún grado de escoliosis cuando al momento de evaluar la Pimax.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…If surveillance of NTD occurrence is challenging, incomplete, and geographically restricted, surveillance of health outcomes is even more limited, even in high‐resource countries . The most commonly reported health outcome is survival, though rarely longer than through infancy or childhood.…”
Section: Triple Surveillance: Tracking the Causal Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If surveillance of NTD occurrence is challenging, incomplete, and geographically restricted, surveillance of health outcomes is even more limited, even in high-resource countries. 1,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The most commonly reported health outcome is survival, though rarely longer than through infancy or childhood. Broader measures of health, such as morbidity, disability, and quality of life, are seldom assessed systematically, and when they are evaluated it is typically within a specific clinical cohort rather than on a population basis.…”
Section: Surveillance Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%