Spinal Anaesthesia in children: Comparative study of isobaric Levobupivacaine 0.5% with or without Clonidine

Cham, Soma C.; Ramtani, Umesh; Kamble, Shubhangi; Cham, Chandrashekharan

doi:10.5958/2394-4994.2015.00016.5

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Onset of sensory block was earlier in our study with levobupivacaine group (2.10 ± 0.26 min) and ropivacaine group (2.63 ± 0.33) as compared to the study[ 12 ] done on levobupivacaine alone (4.9 ± 0.8 min) and levobupivacaine with clonidine (3 ± 0.7 min) in paediatric SA (5-15 years). However, this could be due to distinct site of action of fentanyl and clonidine at spinal level and inter-observer variation in sensory block assessment.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 43%

“…Mean duration of sensory and motor block in levobupivacaine group was 251 ± 41 minutes and 201 ± 40 minutes, respectively, in our study. However, in another study,[ 12 ] sensory and motor block with levobupivacaine alone was 173 ± 17 minutes and 136 ± 12 minutesand with levobupivacaine and clonidine was 297 ± 24 minutes and 232 ± 43 minutes, respectively in 60 patients aged 5–15 years undergoing SAB. These studies showed that addition of adjuvant to LA has improved the sensorimotor block duration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of block characteristics of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine versus isobaric ropivacaine for infra-umbilical surgeries in school-age children: A prospective randomised double-blind study

Bhati

Kiran

Dhawan

et al. 2021

Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are effective local anaesthetic drugs used in regional anaesthesia with low cardio-neurotoxicity profile than bupivacaine, but comparative studies are limited in children. So, we compared these two drugs intrathecally to study their efficacy and safety in school-age children. Methods: This study was carried out in 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, II and III patients aged 6–12 years, of either sex undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries. After institutional ethical committee approval and written informed consent, the patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%, 0.3-0.4 mg/kg), whereas group B received isobaric ropivacaine (0.5%, 0.5 mg/kg) intrathecally. Fentanyl (0.2 μg/kg) was used as an adjuvant in both the groups. Onset, peak and duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of post-operative analgesia, time for micturition, perioperative haemodynamic parameters and complications were compared. Results: Onset and peak of sensory and motor block were earlier in group A. Significantly longer duration of sensory and motor block was achieved in group A (251 ± 41 min, 201 ± 40 min) compared to group B (211 ± 21 min, 102 ± 16 min) ( P < 0.001). The time to first rescue analgesic was also significantly prolonged in group A (270 ± 39 min) compared to group B (233 ± 18 min) ( P < 0.001). Time to micturition was much early in group B (157 ± 27 min) compared to group A (225 ± 31 min) ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine with fentanyl produces effective surgical anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia without any adverse effects. Early regression of sensorimotor blockade makes ropivacaine better in comparison to levobupivacaine for short infra-umbilical surgeries in children.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 43%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%