2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal anaesthesia with a micro-catheter in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal cancer and other major abdominal surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PDPH rate of 1.5% found in our study is consistent with several other studies6,7 and represents an acceptable level of risk 16. Kumar et al20 reported 5.6% PDPH in 68 elderly patients, 65–82 years old. Döhler et al18 observed no cases of PDPH in 154 patients, aged over 70 years (mean 82.3 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PDPH rate of 1.5% found in our study is consistent with several other studies6,7 and represents an acceptable level of risk 16. Kumar et al20 reported 5.6% PDPH in 68 elderly patients, 65–82 years old. Döhler et al18 observed no cases of PDPH in 154 patients, aged over 70 years (mean 82.3 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…CSA provides a number of potential advantages over other forms of anesthesia,13 including hemodynamic stability and extended analgesia 20,23,24. But some anesthesiologists are not permitted to use microcatheters, due to government concern over the risk of cauda equina syndrome, and others have remained reluctant to perform CSA, even with microcatheters, because of uncertainty about the incidence of PDPH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51213] Clinical studies have shown that hemodynamic stability is greater with CSA than with other neuraxial anesthesia techniques,[123814] but limited studies have been published on this technique for elderly patients. Few studies or case reports[9101516] have evaluated the efficacy and safety of CSA in this population, probably because of concerns about potential adverse effects-principally neurologic complications and PDPH. We also think that; the high failure rate of CSA compared with USpA as we had in our study can be evaluated as a disadvantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miyayama et al [7] reported use of liquid and tornado coils through microcatheters, similar to this introducer, for embolization during abdominal vascular interventions. In addition, Kumar et al [8] reported on the successful use of a spinal microcatheter as a …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%