2016
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Testicular Pain: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment of intractable testicular pain has been described in many case reports using either SCS or sacral nerve stimulation. The case report of the conventional SCS implantation described the epidural insertion of two 8-contact leads (Octrodes) close to the dorsal column of the spinal cord at the level of T12-L1 and then starting their stimulation which caused a consistent testicular pain relief (100%) and improvement of the quality of life of the patient at four-months follow-up, but at nine months, he reported continued pain relief while sitting with the stimulator on, but experienced strong electrical shocks along the spine when standing or walking which was overcome with additional programs for standing and walking (4). Also, the case report of sacral nerve stimulation implantation described the insertion of two 8-contact leads (Octrodes) through the sacral hiatus and was placed just medial to the right sided S1, S2, and S3 sacral foramen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The treatment of intractable testicular pain has been described in many case reports using either SCS or sacral nerve stimulation. The case report of the conventional SCS implantation described the epidural insertion of two 8-contact leads (Octrodes) close to the dorsal column of the spinal cord at the level of T12-L1 and then starting their stimulation which caused a consistent testicular pain relief (100%) and improvement of the quality of life of the patient at four-months follow-up, but at nine months, he reported continued pain relief while sitting with the stimulator on, but experienced strong electrical shocks along the spine when standing or walking which was overcome with additional programs for standing and walking (4). Also, the case report of sacral nerve stimulation implantation described the insertion of two 8-contact leads (Octrodes) through the sacral hiatus and was placed just medial to the right sided S1, S2, and S3 sacral foramen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A literature review including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE databases yielded just two prior reports of successful utilization of SCS for chronic testicular pain. [ 6 , 9 ] In 2011, Nouri and Brish reported a 57-year-old patient with a history of malignancy-related orchalgia refractory to opioids, ilioinguinal nerve blocks, iliohypogastric nerve blocks, and ganglion impar nerve blocks, who underwent SCS placement resulting in >80% pain reduction with a decrease in VAS scores from 5/10 to 1/10 at 6 weeks follow-up [ Table 1 ]. [ 9 ] In 2016, Kiritsy and Siefferman reported a 59-year-old male with bilateral intractable testicular pain due to ruptured epididymitis, who failed various medical interventions (e.g., left spermatic cord stripping and nerve blocks) and underwent SCS; 3 weeks postoperatively, he had 100% pain relief that lasted for 9 months [ Table 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 ] In 2016, Kiritsy and Siefferman reported a 59-year-old male with bilateral intractable testicular pain due to ruptured epididymitis, who failed various medical interventions (e.g., left spermatic cord stripping and nerve blocks) and underwent SCS; 3 weeks postoperatively, he had 100% pain relief that lasted for 9 months [ Table 1 ]. [ 6 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation