2018
DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2018.2112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal cord stimulation may improve not only intractable pain but also necrotic wounds

Abstract: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), an implantable neuromodulation modality, is one of the most exciting developments in chronic pain syndromes. In addition, SCS may improve intractable pain and may help ischemic wound healing. Herein, we report a 59-year-old female patient with persistent neuropathic pain and peripheral arterial disease in the lower limb which was treated successfully with SCS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With reference to (Figure 1), twelve narrative reviews [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] were excluded since they may have a potentially higher level of bias and generally interpreted data older than 10 years with no statistical results. Six systematic reviews [29][30][31][32][33][34] were excluded due to the inclusion of studies older than 10 years and the overlap of data that may lead to bias. Four case reports [35][36][37][38] were excluded since they covered individual cases or a limited number of cases, considering them weak evidence to make use of.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With reference to (Figure 1), twelve narrative reviews [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] were excluded since they may have a potentially higher level of bias and generally interpreted data older than 10 years with no statistical results. Six systematic reviews [29][30][31][32][33][34] were excluded due to the inclusion of studies older than 10 years and the overlap of data that may lead to bias. Four case reports [35][36][37][38] were excluded since they covered individual cases or a limited number of cases, considering them weak evidence to make use of.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several limitations were encountered throughout the review process, including difficulties accessing the EMBASE database, limitations in the NOS bias assessment test, unavailability of full-text reports in some studies, errors in content generated by GPT-4, data heterogeneity, and time constraints. In light of the presented evidence from various systematic reviews, including Asimakidou, et al [29,31,33,34], the interpretation of the results suggests that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) shows great potential as an effective treatment for managing chronic pain of ischemic origin and preserving the affected limbs, particularly in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Moderate to high quality evidence that tonic SCS is effective in non-reconstructable CLI patients was brought up by Asimakidou, et al [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations