2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal hyperostosis and ankylosis in a Gallo-Roman horse from Iwuy ‘Val-de-Calvigny’ (Nord, France): ‘Ankylosing spondylarthritis’ (spondylarthritis ankylopoetica), ‘deforming spondylarthrosis’ (spondylarthrosis deformans) or ‘DISH’ (hyperostosis vertebralis ankylopoetica)? An archeozoological and comparative nosological review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because documentation of the presence of the specific pathogen is not possible, the lesions should rather be considered as an effect of mechanical stress resulting from excessive use of the horse. The most common effect of excessive loading of the spine in horses are changes associated with osteophytes on the spinous processes (Kissing spine syndrome), spondylosis or anastomosis of the spinal arches (Janeczek et al, 2014;Lignereux & Bouet, 2015), which were not observed in this case. However, only a few studies documented vertebral pathology in horses.…”
Section: Genesis Of Alterations and Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Because documentation of the presence of the specific pathogen is not possible, the lesions should rather be considered as an effect of mechanical stress resulting from excessive use of the horse. The most common effect of excessive loading of the spine in horses are changes associated with osteophytes on the spinous processes (Kissing spine syndrome), spondylosis or anastomosis of the spinal arches (Janeczek et al, 2014;Lignereux & Bouet, 2015), which were not observed in this case. However, only a few studies documented vertebral pathology in horses.…”
Section: Genesis Of Alterations and Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The recorded statistical distribution of changes in the different parts of the spine can be explained by the way in which horses were used and the course of the biomechanics of the movements dependent on the performance of specific vital utility functions. When horses were used as mounts, the areas most susceptible to injury were the saddle areas [20,[43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of horseback riding and mounted warfare is also evident in the zooarcheological literature, which has seen a significant growth in paleopathological studies related to the history of equestrianism during recent years. These include pathologies related to bit wear (Albizuri et al, 2019;Anthony & Brown, 2011;Bendrey, 2007aBendrey, , 2007cBendrey et al, 2013;Li et al, 2020;Outram et al, 2009;Taylor et al, 2021), osseous changes to the mandible and cranium due to bridling (Bendrey, 2007a;Cosack, 2013;Onar et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 2015), studies of intervertebral ankylosis or spondylitic changes (Bartosiewicz & Bartosiewicz, 2002;Bulatovi c et al, 2014;Janeczek et al, 2014;Li et al, 2020;Lignereux & Bouet, 2015), and vertebral endplate lesions (Baron, 2018;Bendrey, 2007c;Levine et al, 2000Levine et al, , 2005Li et al, 2020;Pluskowski et al, 2010). Together, these studies have greatly contributed to the development of new methodologies and to our knowledge of the use of horses in prehistoric and protohistoric times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%