Abstract:Roentgen stereophotogrammetry may detect motion in the in vivo cervical spine with a sensitivity heretofore unavailable. In patient 1, we were able to detect motion before it was visually manifest. In patient 2, small motions were detected at the level of a successful anterior cervical fusion, the significance of which remain uncertain.
“…It is supposed that the presence of a fusion could increase load and segmental range of motion at adjacent levels and cause localized trauma with subsequent accelerated disc degeneration [25,26,42]. Whether a cervical fusion results in accelerated adjacent disc degeneration with clinical manifestation of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy or these are related to a natural development in a predisposed person is currently under debate [7,9,22,23,25,26,42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screw for monocortical fixation is a titanium, self-tapping, conical screw of 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 mm length with an outer diameter of 4.0 mm. The single level plate is offered with a length of 20,22,24,26,28,30, and 32 mm.…”
“…It is supposed that the presence of a fusion could increase load and segmental range of motion at adjacent levels and cause localized trauma with subsequent accelerated disc degeneration [25,26,42]. Whether a cervical fusion results in accelerated adjacent disc degeneration with clinical manifestation of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy or these are related to a natural development in a predisposed person is currently under debate [7,9,22,23,25,26,42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screw for monocortical fixation is a titanium, self-tapping, conical screw of 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 mm length with an outer diameter of 4.0 mm. The single level plate is offered with a length of 20,22,24,26,28,30, and 32 mm.…”
“…[95][96][97][98] In this method, metal markers are implanted into bone and images are obtained. From the displacement of marker positions, the osteokinematic motion may be quantified.…”
Section: Biomechanical Evidence Of Intrapelvic Motionmentioning
“…Most studies rely on the analysis of medical imaging to evaluate changed cervical spine kinematics [1,2], and segmental changes due to fusion or prosthesis surgery have been demonstrated [3].…”
Purpose Analyzing and comparing the range of motion and movement pattern of subjects who underwent an anterior cervical fusion using trabecular metal with control subjects. Methods Three-dimensional kinematics of planar active axial rotation and active lateral bending of 50 experimental and 41 control subjects were registered by means of an electromagnetic tracking system. Results Comparing the experimental group with the control group reveals that the range of the main motion component differs significantly (p \ 0.01) during the active axial rotation and lateral bending movement. During active axial rotation, the coupled lateral bending motion component also differs between both groups. The root mean square value of the jerkiness (derivative of the acceleration) and de deviation from the 6-polynomial smoothed function of the main as well as the coupled motion component express the qualitative aspects of kinematics and are significantly different between the experimental and the control group for both movements (p \ 0.05).Conclusions Subjects who have an anterior cervical fusion with trabecular metal show significant quantitative as well as qualitative differences in cervical kinematics during active axial rotation and lateral bending compared to control subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.