Spinal Tumors: Statistics on a Series of 330 Collected Cases

Steinke, Carl R.

doi:10.1097/00005053-191806000-00003

The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

1918

DOI: 10.1097/00005053-191806000-00003

|View full text |Cite

Spinal Tumors: Statistics on a Series of 330 Collected Cases

Carl R. Steinke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1921

2009

Publication Types

Select...

Article7

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent7

Authors

Journals

Cited by 40 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Thirty years after its introduction, alternative methods for operating disc pathologies were developed. 7 The posterolateral access for vertebral body biopsies was described in the late 1940s.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique

Ruetten¹,

Komp²,

Merk³

et al. 2008

Spine

767

620

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The clinical results of the full-endoscopic technique are equal to those of the microsurgical technique. At the same time, there are advantages in the operation technique and reduced traumatization. With the surgical devices and the possibility of selecting an interlaminar or posterolateral to lateral transforaminal procedure, lumbar disc herniations outside and inside the spinal canal can be sufficiently removed using the full-endoscopic technique, when taking the appropriate criteria into account. Full-endoscopic surgery is a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to microsurgical procedures.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique

Ruetten¹,

Komp²,

Merk³

et al. 2008

Spine

767

620

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1,69,77,104,106 Percutaneous operations have been performed since the early 1970s. 12,31,37,44,63 In the late 1970s, a surgical procedure involving a microscope was developed to gain interlaminar access.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Ruetten

Komp

Merk

et al. 2009

SPI

267

187

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Object Extensive decompression with laminectomy where appropriate is often still described as the method of choice in surgery for lateral recess stenosis. Nonetheless, tissue-sparing procedures are becoming more common. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer in surgical technique and in rehabilitation. Transforaminal and interlaminar access provide 2 full-endoscopic (FE) techniques for lumbar spine surgery. The goal of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the surgical results for the FE technique via the interlaminar approach with those of the conventional microsurgical technique in patients with degenerative lateral recess stenosis. Methods A total of 161 patients with FE or microsurgical decompression underwent follow-up for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: visual analog scale, German version of the North American Spine Society instrument, and the Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire. Results The results show that 74.5% of patients reported no longer having leg pain, and 20.5% had only occasional pain. The clinical results were the same in both groups. The rate of complications and revisions was significantly reduced in the FE group. The FE techniques brought advantages in the following areas: operation, complications, traumatization, and rehabilitation. Conclusions The clinical results of the FE interlaminar technique are equal to those of the microsurgical technique. At the same time, there are advantages in the operation technique, such as reduced traumatization. The FE interlaminar spinal decompression procedure is a sufficient and safe supplement and alternative to microsurgical procedures.

show abstract

Observations on Character of the Onset of Spinal Paralysis With Reference to the Significance of the Apoplectiform Type of Onset in Contrast to the Slow Progressive Development of Paralysis

Cadwalader¹

1921

Arch NeurPsych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Spinal Tumors: Statistics on a Series of 330 Collected Cases

Cited by 40 publications

References 0 publications

Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique

Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique

Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Observations on Character of the Onset of Spinal Paralysis With Reference to the Significance of the Apoplectiform Type of Onset in Contrast to the Slow Progressive Development of Paralysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About