2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10440-019-00243-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spine Decompositions and Limit Theorems for a Class of Critical Superprocesses

Abstract: In this paper we first establish a decomposition theorem for size-biased Poisson random measures. As consequences of this decomposition theorem, we get a spine decomposition theorem and a 2-spine decomposition theorem for some critical superprocesses. Then we use these spine decomposition theorems to give probabilistic proofs of the asymptotic behavior of the survival probability and Yaglom's exponential limit law for critical superprocesses.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 60J80, 60F05. Key words and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main motivation for developing this new proof for the classical Yaglom's theorem is that this new method is generic, in the sense that it can be generalized to more complicated critical branching systems. In fact, in our follow-up paper [8], we show that, in a similar spirit, a two-spine structure can be constructed for a class of critical superprocesses, and a probabilistic proof of a Yaglom type theorem can be obtained for those processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main motivation for developing this new proof for the classical Yaglom's theorem is that this new method is generic, in the sense that it can be generalized to more complicated critical branching systems. In fact, in our follow-up paper [8], we show that, in a similar spirit, a two-spine structure can be constructed for a class of critical superprocesses, and a probabilistic proof of a Yaglom type theorem can be obtained for those processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is made precise in Section 3. A similar type of argument is also used in our follow-up paper [8] for critical superprocesses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X be a non-persistent superprocess. In this subsection, we will prove the following: To prove this, we will need the generalized spine decomposition theorem from [34]. Let f ∈ B b (E, R + ), T > 0 and x ∈ E. Suppose that P δx [X T (f )] = N x [W T (f )] = P ρ 1 T f (x) ∈ (0, ∞), then we can define the following probability transforms:…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the definition in [34], we say that {ξ, n; Q According to the spine decomposition theorem in [34], we have that…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1], and a cornerstone of the theory of branching processes. Remarkably, it is only recently that Yaglom limit theorems have found their way to the literature for spatial branching processes, for example [13] in the setting of branching Brownian motion and [14,15,16] in the setting of superprocesses. Unfortunately none of the approaches taken there can be transferred to the current setting on account of the fact that there is non-local branching, which complicates calculations significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%