2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0510-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinocerebellar Ataxias in Brazil—Frequencies and Modulating Effects of Related Genes

Abstract: This study describes the frequency of spinocerebellar ataxias and of CAG repeats range in different geographical regions of Brazil, and explores the hypothetical role of normal CAG repeats at ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, CACNA1A, and ATXN7 genes on age at onset and on neurological findings. Patients with symptoms and family history compatible with a SCA were recruited in 11 cities of the country; clinical data and DNA samples were collected. Capillary electrophoresis was performed to detect CAG lengths at SCA1, SCA2, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…IPD and AD retrieved from 11 studies comprised four cohorts from Europe,6 7 17 18 three from Asia,8 19 20 one from North America,6 one from Central America21 and three from Brazil 5 22 23. Brazilian cohorts comprised the Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil-RS) cohort23 and cohorts from other Brazilian regions (Brazil-non-RS cohorts): namely, subjects from São Paulo State22 and those described by Neurogenetics Network, a consortium of Brazilian researchers 5. Using both IPDs and ADs, the global linear correlation coefficient between CAGexp and log 10 (AO) was r=−0.743 (95% CI -0.768 to -0.713, p<0.001), meaning that, on average, the causative mutation determines about 55.2% (50.8%–59.0%) of the AO variability in SCA3/MJD worldwide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IPD and AD retrieved from 11 studies comprised four cohorts from Europe,6 7 17 18 three from Asia,8 19 20 one from North America,6 one from Central America21 and three from Brazil 5 22 23. Brazilian cohorts comprised the Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil-RS) cohort23 and cohorts from other Brazilian regions (Brazil-non-RS cohorts): namely, subjects from São Paulo State22 and those described by Neurogenetics Network, a consortium of Brazilian researchers 5. Using both IPDs and ADs, the global linear correlation coefficient between CAGexp and log 10 (AO) was r=−0.743 (95% CI -0.768 to -0.713, p<0.001), meaning that, on average, the causative mutation determines about 55.2% (50.8%–59.0%) of the AO variability in SCA3/MJD worldwide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of confirmation in other cohorts is most likely attributed to small sample sizes6 7 or inclusion of ATXN2 in regression analysis as a continuous variable 5. Whether the modulatory effect of ATXN2 would be due to the CAG tract directly, or another genetically linked variant, is still unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of these features, particularly seizures, is not uniform as a large SCA10 series from Brazil with 60 patients from 10 families described ataxia as the sole manifestation, with seizures detected in a frequency similar to that expected for the general population [4]. In contrast, in a series of 23 SCA10 patients from different Brazilian states, epilepsy was found in 65% of the cases, presenting with tonic-clonic seizures or combinations of myoclonic, complex partial, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures [5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the atrophy of these regions may result in basic cerebellar signs like ataxia in SCA2 patients. The lobule VI/VII and Crus I of cerebellum are associated with language, verbal working memory, spatial processing, executive functions, and emotional control (D'Agata, Caroppo, Baudino et al., 2011; de Castilhos et al., 2014; Stoodley & Schmahmann, 2009). The atrophy in cerebellar lobule Crus II of cerebellum also plays a role in cognitive impairments, which has been reported (Stoodley & Schmahmann, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%