1975
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1975.57.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinor norms of local integral rotations. I

Abstract: The spinor norms of integral rotations on a modular quadratic form over a local field are determined. Whenever possible, these results are expressed in convenient closed forms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
8

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
59
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…[3], [4]). These computations have been performed whenever the local form is modular (see [2]). In the case of an arbitrary form, the Jordan splitting can be used to decompose the given form as an orthogonal sum of modular forms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3], [4]). These computations have been performed whenever the local form is modular (see [2]). In the case of an arbitrary form, the Jordan splitting can be used to decompose the given form as an orthogonal sum of modular forms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when d = 2, the theory is a good deal more intricate. We show that here too in most cases K is representable by every proper spinor genus in the genus of L; the exceptional cases will be pointed out, and there one needs to know the precise results for the local computations of the spinor norms of local integral rotations on L p ] the known facts about these are found in [3] for nondyadic p, in [1] for unramified dyadic p, and in [2] …”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore the only isometries of L 2 + ν are those fixing ν, and hence are precisely the isometries of K 2 described above. In particular, it follows from [11,Lemma 1] (L 2 + ν)). When p = 3, then we consider the generalized lattice M/L, as defined in [25], which has the orthogonal group (L 3 + ν)) is generated by pairs of symmetries coming…”
Section: Lemma 32 For Any Odd Prime Pmentioning
confidence: 93%