Spirituality, religiosity and the mental health consequences of social isolation during Covid-19 pandemic

Abstract

Background: Evidence shows that religiosity and spirituality (R/S) are highly used in critical moments of life and that these beliefs are associated with clinical outcomes. However, further studies are needed to assess these beliefs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aims: To evaluate the use of R/S during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and to investigate the association between R/S and the mental health consequences of social isolation. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in May 2020. Online surveys were carried out assessing sociodemographics, R/S measures, and social isolation characteristics and mental health consequences (hopefulness, fear, worrying and sadness). Adjusted regression models were used. Results: A total of 485 participants were included from all regions of Brazil. There was a high use of religious and spiritual beliefs during the pandemic and this use was associated with better mental health outcomes. Lower levels of worrying were associated with greater private religious activities (OR = 0.466, CI 95%: 0.307–0.706), religious attendance (OR = 0.587, CI 95%: 0.395–0.871), spiritual growth (OR = 0.667, CI 95%: 0.448–0.993) and with an increase in religious activities (OR = 0.660, CI 95%: 0.442–0.986); lower levels of fear were associated with greater private religious activities (OR = 0.632, CI 95%: 0.422–0.949) and spiritual growth (OR = 0.588, CI 95%: 0.392–0.882) and, lower levels of sadness (OR = 0.646, CI 95%: 0.418–0.997) were associated with spiritual growth. Finally, hope was associated with all R/S variables in different degrees (ranging from OR = 1.706 to 3.615). Conclusions: R/S seem to have an important role on the relief of suffering, having an influence on health outcomes and minimizing the consequences of social isolation. These results highlight the importance of public health measures that ensure the continuity of R/S activities during the pandemic and the training of healthcare professionals to address these issues.

Meaning in Life, Religious Coping, and Loneliness During the Coronavirus Health Crisis in Turkey

“…In the context of current pandemic, higher levels of positive religious coping, intrinsic religiosity, and trust in God significantly associated with lower levels of stress and more positive impact of COVID-19, whereas higher levels of negative religious coping and mistrust in God were related to greater stress and negative impacts (Pirutinsky et al 2020 ). Furthermore, higher use of religious and spiritual beliefs during the COVID-19 pandemic was related to better mental health outcomes including hope and spiritual growth (Lucchetti et al 2020 ). There is also a close link between religious coping strategies and loneliness, for example, in a recent study, positive religious coping was found to be negatively associated with loneliness both concurrently and longitudinally (French et al 2020 ).…”

Religious Coping, Depression and Anxiety among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Malaysian Perspective

“…In the same review, spirituality was found to aid HCWs in coping with stress, encourage recovery, resilience and reduction in burnout. Another study in Brazil also revealed the significant role of religiosity and spirituality in reducing fear, sorrow and anxiety in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent social isolation [ 11 ].…”

Individual Differences Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Age, Gender, Personality, and Positive Psychology

“…For example, research has shown that throughout the pandemic, Google searches for “prayer” (relative to all Google searches), were at the highest level ever recorded, and more than half of the world's population had prayed to end coronavirus (Bentzen, 2020 ). Another study carried out during the pandemic found that religiosity had a positive influence on health outcomes and could minimize the effects of social isolation (Lucchetti et al, 2020 ). However, other studies have shown that highly religious participants reported more unreasonable behavior (e.g., avoiding 5G networks, hoarding toilet paper) than participants with low religiosity, although these behaviors were mediated through emotionality (Kranz et al, 2020 ).…”